Two conducting spheres connected by a wire

AI Thread Summary
Two conducting spheres connected by a wire can be analyzed by setting their potentials equal to determine the charges Q1 and Q2. The total charge of the system, Q, must be expressed in terms of the radii R1 and R2 of the spheres. The relationship Q2 = Q - Q1 can be used to substitute and find expressions for Q1 and Q2. Additionally, the electric fields just outside each sphere can be calculated, showing that the ratio of the fields is inversely proportional to their respective radii. This approach clarifies the relationship between charge distribution and electric fields in the system.
gralla55
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two conduction spheres with radius R1 og R2 are connected with a conducting wire. The length difference between the spheres is large enough to neglect any effect their respective electric fields have on each other. The total charge of the system is Q.

Find the charges Q1 and Q2 on each of the spheres, expressed by R1, R2 and Q.

Find the size of the eletric field just outside each of the spheres. Show that the ratio between the sizes of the fields is reversed propotional to their respective radius.

The Attempt at a Solution



So what I did was to set their potentials equal to each other, and solve for Q1 and Q2 (see attachment). Nothing new here, but what confuses me is that they want me also to express Q1 and Q2 in terms of Q. I don't get why you would need Q (the total charge) to begin with when you have either Q1 or Q2...

The second part I did correct I believe.

Thanks for any input as usual!
 

Attachments

  • chargedspheres.jpg
    chargedspheres.jpg
    55.2 KB · Views: 558
Physics news on Phys.org
You haven't actually found expressions for Q1 and Q2 separately. You found a relation between them which allowed you to answer the second part. The question assumes that R1, R2, and total charge Q are the "given" quantities. You are asked to find expressions for Q1 and Q2 in terms of the given quantities.
 
Allright, but can't I just use the fact that Q2 = (Q - Q1), and substitute it into my equations like this? (attachment)

Thanks again!
 

Attachments

  • chargedspheres2.jpg
    chargedspheres2.jpg
    43.8 KB · Views: 596
Yes. Good. I think that's what they wanted.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top