Two covariant derivatives of a vector field

Deadstar
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
V_{a;b} = V_{a,b} - \Gamma^d_{ad}V_d

Now take the second derivative...

V_{a;b;c} = (V_{a;b})_{,c} - \Gamma^f_{ac}V_{f;b} - \Gamma^f_{bc}V_{a;f}

But I have no idea how to get the parts with the Christoffel symbols.

V_{a;b;c} = (V_{a;b})_{,c} - \Gamma^f_{(a;b)c}V_{af} = (V_{a;b})_{,c} - \Gamma^f_{ac}V_{af;b}..?

Yes the above is clearly wrong but how is this supposed to be done?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should start with the following general definition:

V_{a_1\ldots a_k;b}= V_{a_1\ldots a_k,b}-\sum_{i=1}^k \Gamma^f_{ba_i}V_{a_1\ldots a_{i-1}fa_{i+1}\ldots a_k}

(with understanding that there is no i-1 for i=1)

Simply take it as a definition of the covariant derivative of a covariant tensor of order k. This definition is a natural extension of the covariant derivative to tensors, but it does not follow from the definition of the covariant derivative of vectors. It will follow as a unique extension satisfying certain natural requirements (sometimes explicit, sometimes implicit, depending on the author), but it does not follow from the formula alone.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top