Two-deminsional motion problem: HELP

  • Thread starter Thread starter ashleyymariie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a two-dimensional motion problem involving a KC135A aircraft performing parabolic flights in microgravity for astronaut training. The aircraft ascends from 24,000 ft to 28,210 ft, entering a free-fall state at a velocity of 150 m/s at a 45° angle. Participants are trying to determine the aircraft's altitude at the top of the maneuver using kinematic equations. There is a mention of difficulty in applying the correct equations, with references to projectile motion examples for guidance. The conversation highlights the challenges of solving the problem and the need for clarity in the attempted solutions.
ashleyymariie
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
two-deminsional motion problem: HELP!

Homework Statement



In microgravity astronaut training and equipment testing, NASA flies a KC135A aircraft along a parabolic flight path. As shown in the figure, the aircraft climbs from 24,000 ft to 28,210 ft, where it enters a parabola with a velocity of 150 m/s at 45.0° nose high and exits with velocity 150 m/s at 45.0° nose low. During this portion of the flight, the aircraft and objects inside its padded cabin are in free-fall; astronauts and equipment float freely as if there were no gravity.

What is the aircraft's altitude at the top of the maneuver?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I tried using the basic kinematics equations but I am not ending up with the correct altitude
 
Physics news on Phys.org


i have already tried that
 


It's hard to tell where you've gone wrong without seeing your attempt at the solution.
 


GOT IT! thanks!
 


Cool!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top