Two-Dimensional motion components

  • Thread starter Thread starter wallace13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Components Motion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the average acceleration of a horse running at a speed of 15 m/s at an angle of 29° north of west after 27 seconds. The average acceleration was found to be 0.56 m/s directed north of west. Participants noted the need to use sine and cosine functions to determine the x and y components of acceleration, but encountered issues with incorrect answers on webassign.net. It was emphasized that since north and east are positive directions, the westward component must be negative. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly interpreting directional components in two-dimensional motion problems.
wallace13
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
A wild horse starts from rest and runs in a straight line 29° north of west. After 27 s of running in this direction, the horse has a speed of 15 m/s. Find the magnitude of the horse's average acceleration. Assuming that north and east are the positive directions, find the component of the horse's acceleration that points along the north-south line. Find the component of the horse's acceleration that points along the east-west line.



Vf= at

sin O= opp/hyp

cos O= adj/ hyp

I found the average acceleration to be .56 m/s north of west using the first equation. I would assume that the the x and y components it asks for would be found using the sin and cosine equations, but i get the wrong answer ( .29 m/s and .49 m/s)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you know that that is the wrong answer?
 
Because we type our answers into webassign.net and it tells us if we're right or wrong.
 
The problem states that North and East are defined as the positive directions. However, the resultant acceleration of the horse is north of WEST. Therefore, one of the components will be negative.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top