Two-electrode spherical system (Potential)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the evaluation of potential in a two-electrode spherical system, specifically addressing the integral used to determine the potential difference. A participant questions the introduction of a negative sign in the integral and its implications for the limits of integration. They assert that the potential should be referenced from the inner conductor, leading to confusion about the evaluation of the integral. The conversation concludes with agreement on the necessity of a negative sign in the integral evaluation, confirming the correct expression for potential. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of careful integral evaluation in electrostatics.
jegues
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



See figure attached.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



See figure attached for the provided solution.

I got everything up to what I put in a red box.

Where does he get that negative from?

Did he do that with the intentions of reversing the limits on his integral?
 

Attachments

  • Q22010.jpg
    Q22010.jpg
    33 KB · Views: 461
Physics news on Phys.org
\displaystyle \Phi_r-\Phi_b=-\int_b^r\vec{E}\cdot\vec{dr}
 
SammyS said:
\displaystyle \Phi_r-\Phi_b=-\int_b^r\vec{E}\cdot\vec{dr}

Isn't that the potential at some radius r, with the reference set at radius b?

In the question it says that the reference for the potential should be the potential on the inner conductor where the radius is a.

I have the urge to write,

\phi(r) = \int_{b}^{r} \vec{E} \cdot \vec{dr} + C

Where C is chosen such that,

\phi(a) = 0

but we already know from the first part that it is already 0, so C=0.
 
Last edited:
From the first part, we know that Φb = Φa
 
SammyS said:
From the first part, we know that Φb = Φa


On the third line from the bottom, didn't he miss a negative when he evaluated his integral?

It should be,

\left(-\frac{1}{r} \right)^{r}_{c} = \frac{1}{c} - \frac{1}{r}

Correct?
 
After looking at it for some time, I agree with you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top