Two gear system in static equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the angle of twist at end A of two solid steel shafts connected by meshed gears, with shaft DC fixed at D. The angle of twist is calculated using the formula that incorporates torque, shaft length, polar moment of inertia, and shear modulus. The participant notes a discrepancy in the torque values, stating that while the torque at A is 45 Nm, the torque at D is calculated to be -22.5 Nm based on the balance of forces at the gear mesh. This inconsistency raises questions about the correct application of static equilibrium principles and torque balance. The conversation highlights the importance of ensuring that torques are balanced around the same axis for accurate calculations.
Jage
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two solid steel shafts are coupled together using meshed gears. Determine the angle of twist of end A. Shaft DC is fixed at D.

Homework Equations



angle of twist = torque * shaft length / ( polar moment of inertia * shear modulus)

balance of forces where the two gears mesh:
150mm * Fab = 0.75mm * Fcd

The Attempt at a Solution



I know the solution, but am puzzled about what is wrong with the following approach:

The sum of forces and moments on the system must equal zero since the system is at static equilibrium. Since torque exerted on the system at A is 45Nm, the torque exerted on the system at D must therefore be -45 Nm.

However, balancing forces at where the two gears mesh shows that torque at D is really -22.5 Nm.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    9.4 KB · Views: 822
Physics news on Phys.org
To balance torques, they must be about the same axis.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top