How Does Adding a Second Mass Affect the Dynamics of a Vertical Spring?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the dynamics of a vertical spring with two identical masses. When a second 7 kg mass is added, the spring stretches an additional 1.3 m, leading to a calculated spring constant of 52.82 N/m. After the string is burned and the second mass falls off, the challenge is to determine how high the remaining mass reaches and its maximum speed. The conservation of energy principle is emphasized, requiring a correct setup of potential and kinetic energy equations. Clarifications on the definitions of variables like h and h0 are provided to aid in solving the problem.
Thefox14
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]https://wug-s.physics.uiuc.edu/cgi/courses/shell/common/showme.pl?cc/DuPage/phys2111/fall/homework/Ch-08-GPE-ME/twomasses_vertical_spring/3.gif

A block of mass 7 kg hangs on a spring. When a second block with an identical mass of 7 kg is tied to the first, the spring stretches an additional ho = 1.3 m.

a) What is the value of the spring constant k?

Now the string is burned and the second block falls off.
b) How far above its original position does the remaining block attain its maximum speed?

c) What is the maximum speed attained by the remaining block?

Homework Equations



W_{Total} = \Delta K
W_{NC} = \Delta ME

The Attempt at a Solution



I was able to figure out part a and b fairly easily.
A) was 52.82 N/m
B) was 1.3 m

Part c is where I'm stuck. So far what I've done is set the point where the string is at equilibrium with no weight on it where potential energy = 0. Since there are no Non Conservative forces I sad:

\frac{1}{2}k(2h)^{2} - mg(2h) = \frac{1}{2}mv_{f}^{2}
Where 2h is twice the answer found in B
I get the left side to be a negative number, what am i doing wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thefox14 said:
Part c is where I'm stuck. So far what I've done is set the point where the string is at equilibrium with no weight on it where potential energy = 0. Since there are no Non Conservative forces I sad:

\frac{1}{2}k(2h)^{2} - mg(2h) = \frac{1}{2}mv_{f}^{2}
Where 2h is twice the answer found in B
I get the left side to be a negative number, what am i doing wrong?
Your conservation of energy idea is a good idea. But equation isn't set up quite right.

For what I'm about to say, refer back to the figure (maybe a few times). There's more than one way to approach this problem, but as long as your figure has defined h and h0 for you already, we should use them as they are defined.

To start, find the total energy of the system when the spring is stretched to its maximum (i.e. when h = 0).

There are 3 things to consider: the spring's potential energy, the block's kinetic energy, and the gravitational potential energy. But when h = 0, the block is not moving, so the kinetic energy is zero. And we can define the reference point for gravitational potential at any height we choose. Just to make things simple, define the graviational potential energy to be zero when h = 0. So that just leaves the spring. What is the spring's potential energy when h = 0? (Hint: this will be the total energy of the system; and it is a function solely of k and h0).

As time goes on, after the string breaks, the total energy of the system remains constant. So set the total energy of the system equal to the sum of the following:
o The potential energy of the spring (a function of k, h0, and h).
o The gravitational potential energy (a function of m, g, and h).
o The kinetic energy (a function of m and v).

(Note that since we defined the gravitational potential energy to be 0 when h = 0, the gravitational potential energy is not a function of h0. Refer again to your attached figure if you need to.)

Solve for v when h = h0 (and you might want to make note that h0 = mg/k).

Good luck! :smile:.
 
I'm not quite sure what h represents in the diagram as its pretty much the same as h0. I know h0 is the amount the spring has stretched from its equilibrium though.

It sounds like you're setting the potential energy to be 0 when the spring is stretched to its max. So U0 would be (1/2)kx2, with the x equal to the total amount stretched correct? So it would be 2.6m (2* 1.3m). The place where kinetic energy is the highest would be where the spring is relaxed without the mass on it right? So wouldn't this be h0 = 0 and (1/2)mv2 + mgh with h being 2.6m?

Could you explain what h is? I think that's the one part I'm missing.

Thanks for the reply!
 
Thefox14 said:
I'm not quite sure what h represents in the diagram as its pretty much the same as h0. I know h0 is the amount the spring has stretched from its equilibrium though.

It sounds like you're setting the potential energy to be 0 when the spring is stretched to its max. So U0 would be (1/2)kx2, with the x equal to the total amount stretched correct? So it would be 2.6m (2* 1.3m).
Yes, that's right!

But just for clarity, when we talk of potential energy, there are two types of potential energy here. There's the spring's potential energy which is maximum when h = 0, and there is also the gravitational potential energy. We are defining the gravitational potential energy to be 0 when h = 0 (we don't have to do this -- we could assign the gravitational potential energy to be zero at any height we wish. But it makes the math easier if we do it this way). By doing it this way, when h = 0 all the energy in the system is contained in the spring.
The place where kinetic energy is the highest would be where the spring is relaxed without the mass on it right? So wouldn't this be h0 = 0 and (1/2)mv2 + mgh with h being 2.6m?
Look at the diagram again. h0 is a constant and does not vary. The variable h is what varies.

With just the one block on the spring, the maximum kinetic energy is when h = h0. (When h = 2h0, the block's kinetic energy is zero, the spring's potential energy is zero, and all the energy in the system is in the gravitational energy.)
Could you explain what h is? I think that's the one part I'm missing.
h is simply the height of the mass above its minimum amplitude. As the mass oscillates, h varies between 0 and 2h0.
 
collinsmark said:
With just the one block on the spring, the maximum kinetic energy is when h = h0.

Didn't realize that haha, as soon as you said that i got the problem thanks!

Sorry to ask, but there is another problem very similar to this that I have applied the same principles and ideas to and can't get the right answer (I get very close to it though). Would you mind taking a quick look at it?
 
Sure, but you should start a new thread for a new problem. Once you post the new thread, PM me and I'll try to take a look at it.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top