Two men want to carry a wooden beam weighing 200

  • Thread starter Thread starter NoBodyKnows
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Weighing
AI Thread Summary
Two men are attempting to carry a 200 lbs wooden beam that is 20 feet long, with one man wanting to bear 50% more weight than the other. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding torque and balancing forces to determine the correct positioning of each man along the beam. The stronger man should carry a greater proportion of the weight, which can be simplified using ratios. By dividing the total weight into parts, the men can effectively position themselves to maintain balance. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in problem-solving and the application of fundamental physics principles.
NoBodyKnows
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Not sure about this one, any help?

Two men want to carry a wooden beam weighing 200 lbs which is 20 feet long. Both men are equal height however one is stronger than the other and wishes to bear 50% more the weight. How far from the end of the beam should both of the men be to make this possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hi NoBodyKnows, welcome to PF!

For future reference, this should be in the Homework Help subforum and should be posted using the template for homework problems. Hopefully a moderator will move it.

What have you done so far for this problem? Are you familiar with the concept of torque? Also, you can easily work out the ratio between the force exerted by the stronger man and that exerted by the weaker man, right?
 


I understand the idea of using torques. We're trying to separate the lifts into two different problems. Main problem being that the distance we'd use in any formula is relative to what? the center of the beam?
 


NoBodyKnows said:
I understand the idea of using torques. We're trying to separate the lifts into two different problems. Main problem being that the distance we'd use in any formula is relative to what? the center of the beam?

Yeah, relative to the point around which the torques would be exerted. It follows just from the definition of torque that if you're trying to prevent a net rotational acceleration about the centre of mass of the beam, you'd balance the torques about that point, meaning that all of your lever arms would be measured relative to that point.
 


For static problems, in general you can do the following:

Write down the equation that total force is zero (of course take forces as vector with direction, i.e. consider the sign)

Write down total torque about any single point of your choice and equate total torque to zero. Make sure that you take the force component perpendicular to the line to your "center point".

Only for non-stationary problems the torque from external forces and moment of inertia should be taken about the center of mass.

Ah... however, don't forget the gravitational force if you don't use the center of mass as your "center torque point".
 


I would not refer to torque at all when solving this problem, or moments of inertia. It is a simple matter of segmentation. One fellow wants to lift 50% more than the other. So use ratios. Break it down to simple whole numbers. One fellow carries 2 apples - the stronger fella carries 3 apples - that makes a total of 5 apples. It is easy to mentally divide the beam into 5 equal parts and then decide where the two people should be stationed.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top