Two parallel non conducting rings

AI Thread Summary
Two parallel nonconducting rings with uniform charges q1 and q2 are positioned along a common axis, separated by a distance of 3.00R. The electric field magnitudes at point P on this axis have a ratio of 2.87, leading to the need to find the charge ratio q1/q2. The equations for the electric fields E1 and E2 are provided, but clarification is sought regarding the location of point P and the variable d. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the setup and equations to derive the charge ratio effectively. Overall, the challenge lies in applying the electric field equations to find the desired ratio.
SOS2012
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Figure 22-42 shows two parallel nonconducting rings with their central axes along a common line. Ring 1 has uniform charge q1 and radius R; ring 2 has uniform charge q2 and the same radius R. The rings are separated by a distance 3.00R. The ratio of the electric field magnitudes of Ring 1 and Ring 2 at point P on the common line is 2.87. What is the ratio of charge magnitudes q1/q2?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi SOS2012! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(where is P ? :confused: and try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)

Show us what you've tried, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help! :smile:
 


E1/E2=2.87

E1=kq1r/(r^2+r^2)^1.5
E2=kq2(2r)/(r^2+(d-r)^2)^1.5

thats the equations i have but i don't know how i would use them in order to get the ratio of q1/q2
 
(where is P, and what is d ? :confused:)

why can't you find q1/q2 just by dividing?​
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top