Two Point Charges and Magnetic Field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the magnetic forces acting on two electrons due to their charges and velocities. The magnetic field B is derived using the equation B = (μ0/4pi) * q * (v x r̂) / r², with an initial calculation yielding B1 = 0.057. However, the user realizes there are errors in their calculations, particularly in squaring the distance r and the angle used in the sine function. The correct angle for the velocity relative to the radial vector is clarified as 75°, not 45°. Understanding these corrections is crucial for accurately determining the forces acting on both electrons.
Kashuno
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the magnetic forces acting on each electron in the attached image
BChAPee.png



Homework Equations


B = \frac{μ0}{4pi}*q*\frac{v x \hat{r}}{r^{2}}
F_{m} = qv x B

The Attempt at a Solution


B_{1} = 10^{-7} * 1.6*10^{-19} * \frac{5000*10^{3}*sin(45)}{(10*10^{-10})(10*10^{-10})}
B_{1} = .057

Fm_{2} = (1.6*10^{-19})*1000*10^3*.057
Fm_{2} = 9.12*10^{-15}

Now at this point I know something is wrong, but I'm not sure what. I thought the force on the 2nd electron would be the force created by the 1st electron, but that number is definitely screaming incorrect to me. I figure it I understand how to figure out the force on 1 I can figure out the force on the other. (Electron 1 is at the bottom, electron 2 at the top). Where is my mistake?
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In calculating B1 note that r should be squared in the denominator. kilo means 103. Are you sure you want to use 45o for the angle in the sine function? (What is the angle between ##\vec{v}## and ##\hat{r}##?)
 
Woops, don't try and do physics half asleep!:rolleyes: Those first two errors aside, I think I see what angle I am supposed to use. The velocity of B_{1} is 45° from the x axis, but 75° from \hat{r}, since \hat{r} is along r, correct?
 
Looks good.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top