Two protons colide and i am to calculate newly formed mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter 71GA
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Protons
71GA
Messages
208
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two protons with kinetic energies ##W_{k1}=4GeV## and ##W_{k2}=2GeV## colide and form new particles. What is the mass of newly born particles?

Homework Equations


\begin{align}
W_{before}&=W_{after}\\
p_{before}&=p_{after}\\
W^2 &= {W_0}^2 + p^2c^2 \longleftarrow \substack{\text{Lorentz invariant}}
\end{align}

The Attempt at a Solution


First i wrote the energy conservation law:
\begin{align}
W_{before} &= W_{after}\\
W_{k1} + W_{k2} + 2W_{0p} &= \sqrt{{W_{0~after}}^2 +p^2c^2}\longleftarrow\substack{\text{Here the $W_{0~after}$ is a full}\\\text{rest energy after colision}}\\
W_{k1} + W_{k2} + 2W_{0p} &= \sqrt{\underbrace{\left( 2W_{0p} + W_{0m} \right)^2}_{\smash{\substack{\text{after collision we have}\\\text{2 $p^+$ and new mass $m$}}}} +p^2c^2}
\end{align}

Here i am not sure what to do with the ##p^2c^2##. Can i just take the mass frame and say ##p=0##? Why yes and why not?

Other option i am thinking of is to say that ##pc = \sqrt{{W_{k~before}}^2 - 2W_{k~before}W_{0~before}}##. Here i know that ##W_{0~before}=2W_{0p}##, but i am not sure what to put in for ##W_{k~before}##. Can i do it like ##W_{k~before} = W_{k1}+W_{k2}##?

Which of these two options is right/wrong and why? If both are wrong please tell me how to fix them to become ok.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Taking the center of mass frame is useful for simplifying the calculations.
Remember that the kinetic energies will change.

Why do you think there are still two protons around after the collision?

Note - you can also use the form: ##W_k=(\gamma -1)mc^2##
 
Simon Bridge said:
Taking the center of mass frame is useful for simplifying the calculations.
Remember that the kinetic energies will change.
How will they change? I guess one will be bigger and other will be smaller than in lab. frame. How do i calculate this? I will also need to calculate the speed of the COM frame.

Simon Bridge said:
Why do you think there are still two protons around after the collision?
I have heard that new mass can be formed in the proximity of the massive bodies - protons have mass...

Simon Bridge said:
Note - you can also use the form: ##W_k=(\gamma -1)mc^2##
To calculate the speed of COM? Where would this eq. come in handy?
 
The total energy of a mass moving at speed v is ##E=\gamma mc^2## - it's just the Einstein mass-energy relation. You keep using ##E^2=m^2c^4+p^2c^2## instead. The kinetic energy is the total energy with the rest-mass energy ##mc^2## removed, thus, ##W_k=(\gamma-1)mc^2##.

Thus ##\gamma^2m^2c^4 = m^2c^4+p^2c*2##
... it can be a useful way to think about your problem in any reference frame.

If you do not have course notes on how to convert to center-of-mass in relativity, it is probably not a good idea to do so.

As it happens - in p-p scattering you get more particle sout than in, so the rest-energy is recovered and two of the particles are protons. This suggests that only the kinetic energy is available make new particles.

The folowing course-notes walks you through the ohysics:
http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/particle_creation.html
 
Thank you.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top