Two ways to calculate the final speed of a rotating cylinder

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the final speed of a uniform cylinder (mass M, radius R) rolling down an incline (angle θ, distance s) using two methods: force analysis and energy conservation. The force method involves applying Newton's Second Law and torque equations, leading to a final speed of √(4/3)sgsinθ. The energy method equates gravitational potential energy (GPE) to rotational kinetic energy, yielding the same final speed. Both methods assume pure rolling without work against static friction, which is a critical consideration in the analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law
  • Familiarity with torque and moment of inertia concepts
  • Knowledge of gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy equations
  • Basic principles of rotational motion and pure rolling
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of static friction in rolling motion
  • Explore advanced topics in rotational dynamics
  • Learn about energy conservation in mechanical systems
  • Investigate the effects of incline angles on rolling objects
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of rolling motion and energy conservation principles.

Xiao10
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Situation:
A uniform cylinder (Mass M, Radius R) is rotating down a slope of incline θ and distance s, there are two methods which I used to calculate the final speed, one of which considered forces acting on the cylinder and the other using energy, pure rolling assumed throughout, both give the same final answer.

Force method:
1) Mgsinθ * R = \frac{3}{2} MR^2 α
(Torque about point of contact * R = Angular acceleration * Moment of inertia)
2) Mgsinθ - F = MRα
(Newton's Second Law, F is Friction).

After finding a to be \frac{2}{3}Mgsinθ, I then used V2= 2as to find the final speed to be\sqrt{\frac{4}{3}sgsinθ}, which is the same as that given by the...

Energy Method:

Simply equated GPE and the final rotational kinetic energy.
Mgh = \frac{1}{2}( \frac{3}{2} MR^2 )ω^2

Problem: The similarity of the answers assumes that somehow the cylinder does no force against static friction, which must be present for rolling.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The cylinder does no work against static friction. The part of the cylinder in contact with the ground always has zero velocity.
 
Problem: The similarity of the answers assumes that somehow the cylinder does no force against static friction, which must be present for rolling.
Not really, you have assumed that there is no work against static friction.

[edit] Hah! I was too sloow!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K