Typical value free air convection heat transfer coefficient

AI Thread Summary
The typical value for the free air convection heat transfer coefficient at high temperatures, such as 1000 degrees Celsius, is debated, with estimates ranging from 5 to 100 W/m²·K. For a vertical cylinder with a diameter of 5 cm and height of 3 cm, the convection coefficient is likely to be higher than at lower temperatures, potentially around 20 W/m²·K as a conservative estimate. At such elevated temperatures, radiation becomes a significant factor, often overshadowing convection effects. Accurate values should ideally be derived from empirical correlations specific to the situation rather than generalized estimates. Understanding the purpose of the calculation and the required accuracy is crucial, as measurement may provide more reliable data than theoretical calculations.
Askara
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
whats would be typical value for free air convection heat transfer coefficient at high temperature of 1000 degree c?

let say i have a vertical cylinder of diameter 5 cm and 3 cm high. and i heat it to 1000 degree c. the room temperature is 20c . what would the convection heat transfer coefficient be?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Note that at that temperature, radiation is probably a much bigger factor than convection, so you're going to want to calculate that.
 
the thing is engineering box say 5 and 25 W/m^2.K, i have seen some website say 5 and 50 W/m^2.K, and wikipedia 10-100 W/m^2.K so i don't really know what to chooese.

plus onvection heat transfer coefficient increase with temperature, it may be 25 W/m^2.K at 20-200 degree c but it will be higher at 1000 degree c.
 
It's a very difficult thing to estimate. I'd pick something conservative inside all three ranges. Like, 20.

What exactly the purpose of this question? Ie, how much accuracy is required? Can you measure instead of calculating? Use a controller?
 
russ_watters thanks, i alway just assumed radiation doesn't matter much but actually as you said, is it much bigger factor than convection. that's why the data i got doesn't match the result from convection
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
Back
Top