U.S. Physics Olympiad F=ma 2008: Problem 12

AI Thread Summary
A uniform disk rotating at a fixed angular velocity has a kinetic energy E when rotating about its center. When it rotates about an axis at its edge, the moment of inertia increases due to the parallel axis theorem, resulting in a new moment of inertia of 3/2MR^2. Consequently, the kinetic energy for this rotation is calculated to be 3E. The discussion clarifies the application of the parallel axis theorem and the relationship between moment of inertia and kinetic energy. The final answer to the problem is confirmed to be 3E.
Ritted
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
12. A uniform disk rotates at a fixed angular velocity on an axis through its center normal to the plane of the disk, and has kinetic energy E. If the same disk rotates at the same angular velocity about an axis on the edge of the disk (still normal to the plane of the disk), what is its kinetic energy?
(a) 1/2E
(b) 3/2E
(c) 2E
(d) 3E
(e) 4E

Answer: D

Relevant Equations: KE= 1/2 I x w^2, I=MR^2

Attempt at Solving: Io=MR^2, In=4MR^2, thus KE=4 (1/2 I x w^2)= 4E

Can someone please explain why the answer is 3E? I really appreciate your assistance! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Rittted, welcome to PF.
Moment of inertia of a uniform disc about an axis through cm perpendicular to the plane is 1/2*M*R^2.
Using theorem of parallel axis, you can find the moment of inertia about an axis on the edge of the disk.
 
Note that for a uniform disk, I = (1/2) m r^2, not m r^2.

Furthermore, the parallel axis theorem may come in handy.

Note that the kinetic energy is linear in I (E = \tfrac{1}{2} I \omega^2) so you only need to show that I = 3 I_\mathrm{cm}, where I is the moment of inertia about the axis on the edge, and I_\mathrm{cm} = \tfrac{1}{2} m r^2
 
Thanks for all of the help guys! I really appreciate it!

So I= 1/2mr^2 + mr= 3/2mr^2=3I

and

KE= 3E

Great!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top