Ultra-high-energy cosmic ray ≠ collision of 2 'normal' rays?

AI Thread Summary
Ultra-high-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) have energies ranging from 10^19 eV to 10^20 eV, significantly exceeding the typical cosmic rays at around 10^9 eV. The discussion explores whether UHECRs could result from collisions between two normal cosmic rays, but it is clarified that the energy from such collisions would only yield a maximum of 2 x 10^9 eV. This indicates that UHECRs cannot be simply explained by the collision of normal cosmic rays due to the vast difference in energy levels. The rarity of UHECR events is also noted, suggesting that their origins remain distinct from typical cosmic ray interactions. Understanding the mechanisms behind UHECRs continues to be a topic of interest in cosmic ray research.
Michel_vdg
Messages
107
Reaction score
1
Hi,


I have a rather basic question: most 'cosmic rays' have an energy of about 109 eV, but there are also 'Ultra-high-energy cosmic rays' with an energy of around 1019 eV to 1020 eV, so I was wondering if they couldn't be the result of collisions of two 'normal' cosmic rays that hit each other from a very sharp angle, and splash open? The energy is about double the size of one single 'normal' event, and these rays are measured depending on the size of the shower, and perhaps chances of 2 normal ones hitting each other just right, could also be very rare.

If it's not possible, than I was curious what would make such an event stand out from a real Ultra-high-energy cosmic ray collision?

thanks,

m.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
10^19 - 10^20 eV is not "about double" 10^9 eV - it is 10-100 billion times larger!
 
phyzguy said:
10^19 - 10^20 eV is not "about double" 10^9 eV - it is 10-100 billion times larger!

oops, ok so two normal ones colliding would than simply give an energy release of 2 x 10^9 eV

thanks.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top