Why Is the Box Not Moving Despite Unbalanced Forces on an Inclined Plane?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BOAS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Rest
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a mechanics problem involving a 5.17 kg box on an inclined plane, where the box remains at rest despite unbalanced forces. The user analyzes the forces acting on the box, including gravitational components and friction, and questions why the box does not move when the downward force exceeds static friction. Clarification is provided that the initial conditions indicate the box starts at rest at the bottom of the ramp, without any hidden implications. The user concludes that understanding these initial conditions is essential for solving the problem, emphasizing that they are not extraneous information. The focus remains on applying kinematics and Newton's laws to determine the required force to move the box up the ramp.
BOAS
Messages
546
Reaction score
19
Hi,

i'm stuck on a mechanics problem where the initial conditions are a mass at rest on an inclined plane, but the forces are seemingly unbalanced.

1. Homework Statement

A 5.17 kg box sits at rest at the bottom of a ramp that is 8.56 m long and that is inclined
at 40.0◦ above the horizontal. The coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.40, and the coefficient
of static friction is 0.50.
What constant force F, applied parallel to the surface of the ramp, is required to push the
box to the top of the ramp in a time of 4.22 s ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I have drawn a freebody diagram with the weight of the box acting straight down. perpendicular to the slope, we have the component $$mg \cos(\theta)$$ and the normal force being $$-mg \cos(\theta)$$. parallel to the slope, a component of the weight acts down the the slope $$mg \sin(\theta)$$ and the force of static friction opposes this motion.

Static friction $$f_{s} \leq \mu_{s} n$$ where $$n = -mg \cos(\theta) = -19.43 N$$

This is the max force that can be applied parallel to the slope without the box beginning to move, but the component of weight acting down the slope is greater than this, so why is the box not moving?

Was I supposed to consider "at the bottom of the slope" to mean the normal force = weight?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe it is just being held there before the force parallel to incline is applied. It is just a pre-condition to start the problem.
 
It seems to me that I don't need this information to solve the problem.

The applied force is parallel to the slope, so kinetic friction remains constant. Using the equations of kinematics, I can determine the acceleration required to cover the distance in that time. Using Newton's second law, I can determine what the net force must be, and therefore the applied force is equal to the difference between the kinetic friction and resultant force.
 
BOAS said:
It seems to me that I don't need this information to solve the problem.
You need to know that it starts at the bottom and that it starts from rest. No hidden meaning beyond that.
 
Doc Al said:
You need to know that it starts at the bottom and that it starts from rest. No hidden meaning beyond that.
Thanks
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top