I Uncertainty Principle: Energy of Unstable Particle?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the uncertainty in energy for unstable particles, specifically questioning whether it can be equated to the energy at which the particle was created. It highlights that muons, despite being produced at various energy levels, exhibit a consistent decay lifetime, suggesting that decay is not energy-dependent. The term "unstable particle" is scrutinized, with an example of a free neutron provided to illustrate varying degrees of instability. The original question stems from a lecture example involving a delta baryon with a specified energy and its mean lifetime calculated using the uncertainty principle. Clarifications reveal the complexities and nuances surrounding the relationship between energy and particle stability.
Kara386
Messages
204
Reaction score
2
For an unstable particle is it reasonable to take the uncertainty in energy as the energy it was created with? If so, why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kara386 said:
For an unstable particle is it reasonable to take the uncertainty in energy as the energy it was created with? If so, why?

Your question is extremely puzzling. What "energy" are you talking about when you are referring to the "uncertainty in energy"?

Secondly, muons are created in many different ways at many different energies. Yet, they have the same decay lifetime. So if you think that a muon's decay is dependent on the energy that was used to create it, then this should already answer your question.

Thirdly, what do you mean by "unstable particle"? How "unstable" are we talking about here? A free neutron is unstable. Is this part of the particle that you want to know even though its lifetime is in minutes?

There are many "baggages" surrounding this question that you have not explained.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
Your question is extremely puzzling. What "energy" are you talking about when you are referring to the "uncertainty in energy"?

Secondly, muons are created in many different ways at many different energies. Yet, they have the same decay lifetime. So if you think that a muon's decay is dependent on the energy that was used to create it, then this should already answer your question.

Thirdly, what do you mean by "unstable particle"? How "unstable" are we talking about here? A free neutron is unstable. Is this part of the particle that you want to know even though its lifetime is in minutes?

There are many "baggages" surrounding this question that you have not explained.

Zz.
Apologies, I didn't really consider those things! Ok, so to clarify:
The question was prompted by an example from a lecture. A delta baryon is produced with energy of 12,300MeV and its mean lifetime is calculated using the uncertainty principle. But the uncertainty in energy used in the calculation was simply the given energy of the delta baryon.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?

Similar threads

Back
Top