Uncovering the Mystery of Electrolytic Cells: The Truth About Free Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter imhungry
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermo
AI Thread Summary
A discussion revolves around the efficiency of electrolytic cells for hydrogen and oxygen production under varying pressure conditions. A friend demonstrated a setup where the cell operates 30 meters underwater, suggesting that the gas produced could provide work as it rises. However, concerns are raised about the validity of claims that gas production remains unchanged under pressure, as thermodynamic principles indicate that higher pressure should affect reaction equilibrium and voltage requirements. The need for more specific data on the pressures tested is emphasized to clarify these claims. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of electrolysis and the potential for misunderstanding in experimental results.
imhungry
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A friend has asked a question of me that has me wishing that my days of thermodynamics were not so long in the past. He and some colleagues have been making electrolytic cells for high production of hydrogen and oxygen from water. In demonstrating one to me he posed an experiment that on the surface seems to produce free energy, which we all know is impossible.

They have tested the cell under pressure and found that it's gas production and the amount of electricity used are no different than at normal atmospheric pressure. He proposed the following setup. Place the electrolytic cell 30 meters under the water (or what ever, the depth does not matter). Flip the switch and hydrogen and oxygen are produced , no surprise there. The energy content of the gasses is not the issue. The gasses can also provide work when they rise to the surface. The amount of gas produced and the amount of electricity used depth is the same as produced at the surface so that part of the equation is a wash. The work provided by placing the cell beneath water and harnessing energy from the rising gas is the part that I cannot account for.

What am I missing?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Hi imhungry, welcome to PF!

With respect to your colleague, I question the claim that gas production was not decreased under higher pressure. Higher pressure should shift the reaction equilibrium and require more voltage, as we know from thermo. Is it possible that decreased gas production or higher required voltage was not detectable within error at the pressure they tried? Was the testing pressure 2 atm or 1000 atm, for example?
 
Thanks Mapes,

I don't know what pressures he tested at but your response is in line with my first thoughts on the issue. My guess is that his tests were at low (a few atmospheres) levels. I will "pressure" him into giving more details.
 
I would be curious to know how easy electrolysis becomes if the pressure is just above the vapor pressure.
 
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top