Uncovering the Mystery of Work Done by Conservative Forces

AI Thread Summary
Work done by conservative forces is defined as Wc = -ΔU, where ΔU represents the change in potential energy. In the discussed scenario, a block sliding on a flat table experiences friction, which is a non-conservative force, leading to work done that does not result in a change in potential energy. The confusion arose from mistakenly considering friction as a conservative force, which it is not, as it depends on the path taken. Therefore, in the absence of potential energy changes, no work is done by conservative forces. Understanding the distinction between conservative and non-conservative forces clarifies the application of the work-energy principle.
ikjadoon
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Work done by conservative forces = -\DeltaU

Homework Equations



Above.

The Attempt at a Solution



Here is the whole equation:

Wc+ Wnc = \DeltaK.

Wnc = \DeltaK + \DeltaU.

So, Wc = -\DeltaU.

But, for example, how does that apply in a situation with no potential energy changes, but still with work done by conservative forces?!

Example: a block slides across a horizontal, flat table and comes to rest due to friction. There was no change in gravitational or spring-related potential energy (the only two forms of potential energy I can think of). However, there was work done (50J or whatever) by friction on the block. Thus, 50J = 0J! There is no change in potential energy, but there was work done by conservative forces.

Where did I go wrong?

Thanks,

~Ibrahim~
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why did you assume that friction was a conservative force? either one of your first 2 equations would be OK to use. The third one says that since there was no potential energy change, there was no work done by conservative forces (no work done by gravity, springs, or other conservative forces).
 
Oh, crap.

Friction is a non-conservative force: it depends on the path.

There are no conservative forces acting, only non-conservative (friction).

0J = 0J.

Got it. Thanks for the solution, however simple!

~Ibrahim~
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top