I Understanding 4-Vector Representations in the Lorentz Group

Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! I am reading some notes on Lorentz group and at a point it is said that the irreducible representations (IR) of the proper orthochronous Lorentz group are labeled by 2 numbers (as it has rank 2). They describe the 4-vector representation ##D^{(\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2})}## and initially I thought this is an IR (also being a fundamental representation). However, further on they say that ##D^{(\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2})} = D^{(\frac{1}{2}, 0)} \oplus D^{(0,\frac{1}{2})}##, which implies that ##D^{(\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2})}## is not an IR. So I am confused, is it or is it not IR? The way I was thinking about it, is that the 4 dimensional vector representation (i.e. under Lorentz group) is an IR while the 4 dim spinor representation (i.e. under ##SL(2,C)##) is not IR. But wouldn't you need different notations for them? Then, ##D^{(0,\frac{3}{2})}## and ##D^{(\frac{3}{2},0)}## are also 4 dimensional, so what should I do with them? Are they IR, too? Can someone clarify this for me? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first part, I will show that if a representation of a product group is constructed from an irreducible representation for each of the groups in it, than that representation is also irreducible.

For irreducibility: for a representation D(a) of a group, if a matrix X satisfies D(a).X = X.D(a), then X must be a multiple of the identity matrix.

For a group G that is a product G1 * G2, its elements are a = (a1,a2) where a1 ranges over all of G1 and a2 does so for G2. A representation D(a) = D1(a1)*D2(a2) where D1 is a rep of G1 and D2 of G2. In component form,

D(a)(i1j1,i2j2) = D1(a1)(i1,j1) * D2(a2)(i2,j2)

To test reducibility, we must find the possible matrices X(i1j1,i2j2) that satisfy D(a)(i1j1,i2j2) * X(j1k1,j2k2) = X(i1j1,i2j2) * D(a)(j1k1,j2k2) over all values of i1,i2,k1,k2 and summed over dummy indices j1,j2. Using the above decomposition of D(a) gives us

D1(a1)(i1,j1) * D2(a2)(i2,j2) * X(j1j2,k1k2) = X(i1i2,j1j2) * D1(a1)(j1,k1) * D2(a2)(j2,k2)

Setting a2 to the identity of G2 gives us D1(a1)(i1,j1) * X(j1i2,k1k2) = X(i1i2,j1k2) * D1(a1)(j1,k1) and since D1 is irreducible,

X(i1i2,j1j2) = δ(i1,j1) * X(i2,j2)

This in turn reduces the equation to D2(a2)(i2,j2) * X(j2,k2) = X(i2,j2) * D2(j2,k2) and that in turn gives us

X(i1i2,j1j2) = δ(i1,j1) * δ(i2,j2) * X

A multiple of the identity matrix. Thus, if component-group reps D1 and D2 are irreducible, then the product-group irrep D = D1 * D2 is also irreducible.

Thus, for the Lorentz group, every representation with form (j1,j2) is irreducible, since each part is irreducible.
 
In general, a product representation of two irreducible representations will be reducible, but if one of the irreps is the unit representation D(a) = 1, then the product will also be an irrep. Thus, (j1,j2) = (j1,0) * (0,j2) where 0 is the unit representation.

The vector rep of the Lorentz group is (1/2,1/2), and is thus irreducible.

The spinor rep is (1/2,0) + (0,1/2) and is thus reducible to two smaller spinors, (1/2,0) and (0,1/2), both irreducible. Each one of them is a rep of SL(2,C), but each one is the complex conjugate of the other.

The reps (3/2,0) and (0,3/2) are both irreducible.

Though all of (1/2,1/2), (1/2,0) + (0,1/2), (3/2,0), and (0,3/2) have size 4, they are all inequivalent.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top