Understanding accelerated frame in general relativity

cramis1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,
apologies if this has been asked before but I couldn't find it upon searching...

My block to understanding general relativity has always been how the idea of gravity being the same as an accelerating frame leads to a a curved space-time?
What about the fact of not knowing whether you are in an accelerated frame or within a gravitational field results in the idea of a space-time and objects having the ability to bend space-time, and therefore, attract other objects?

Thanks
cram
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi cramis1, welcome to PF!
cramis1 said:
What about the fact of not knowing whether you are in an accelerated frame or within a gravitational field results in the idea of a space-time and objects having the ability to bend space-time, and therefore, attract other objects?
I don't think that the equivalence principle leads directly to curved spacetime (at least I don't know the derivation if there is one). I think that it is more along the lines that the equivalence principle is a feature that we would like our theory of gravity to exhibit regardless of how the theory was obtained.

The equivalence principle is usually stated in terms of uniform acceleration or small regions of spacetime where tidal effects can be neglected. Curvature on the other hand deals with regions of spacetime where tidal effects cannot be neglected.

What is your knowledge of special relativity (SR)? Are you familiar with spacetime diagrams, four-vectors, and the geometric interpretation of SR?
 
Last edited:
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top