Understanding |\beta><\alpha| in Sakurai's Book

  • Thread starter Thread starter rasko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
rasko
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
In Sakurai's book, page 22:

|\beta&gt;&lt;\alpha| \doteq<br /> \left( \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> &lt;a^{(1)}|\beta&gt;&lt;a^{(1)}|\alpha&gt;^{*} &amp; &lt;a^{(1)}|\beta&gt;&lt;a^{(2)}|\alpha&gt;^{*} &amp; \ldots \\<br /> &lt;a^{(2)}|\beta&gt;&lt;a^{(1)}|\alpha&gt;^{*} &amp; &lt;a^{(2)}|\beta&gt;&lt;a^{(2)}|\alpha&gt;^{*} &amp; \ldots \\<br /> \vdots &amp; \vdots &amp; \ddots <br /> \end{array} \right)

How can people get it? Following is my idea:

|\beta&gt;&lt;\alpha|\\= |\beta&gt; (\sum_{a&#039;}|a&#039;&gt;&lt;a&#039;|)&lt;\alpha|\\<br /> =\sum_{a&#039;}(&lt;a&#039;|\beta&gt;)(&lt;\alpha|a&#039;&gt;) [STEP *]

then we get
\doteq(&lt;a^{(1)}|\alpha&gt;^{*}, &lt;a^{(2)}|\alpha&gt;^{*} ,\ldots)\cdot <br /> \left( \begin{array}{c}<br /> &lt;a^{(1)}|\beta&gt;\\<br /> &lt;a^{(2)}|\beta&gt;\\<br /> \vdots<br /> \end{array} \right)

Is the STEP* right? I'm not sure if i have understood the ruls of ket and bra.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
STEP* is incorrect. The LHS is a matrix (operator) while the RHS is a number (a scalar). What you have actually calculated (your error is in not being careful with the order) is the inner product\langle \alpha | \beta \rangle = \sum_{a&#039;} \langle \alpha | a&#039; \rangle \langle a&#039; | \beta \rangle.

For the outer product, you are (post)multiplying a row vector with a column vector (in that order). Reversing the order gives the inner product, a scalar.
 
Thank you!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top