Understanding Black Hole Equations Conceptually

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ryan Jackson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole Holes
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conceptual understanding of black hole equations, particularly the significance of the Schwarzschild radius, expressed as 2MG/c². Participants explore the implications of this equation and seek clarity on its conceptual meaning beyond the mathematical derivation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express a need for a conceptual understanding of the Schwarzschild radius, questioning how it can be interpreted meaningfully beyond its mathematical formulation.
  • One participant suggests that the escape velocity from a black hole must equal the speed of light, linking this to the derivation of the radius using Newtonian mechanics.
  • Another participant highlights the complexity of deriving the Schwarzschild solution from Einstein's field equations, emphasizing the difficulty in understanding the underlying concepts.
  • A participant points out that understanding the derivation of an equation implies understanding the result, suggesting that a lack of conceptual clarity may indicate a gap in comprehension of the derivation itself.
  • One participant argues that the units of GM/c² yield a length, supporting the interpretation of the Schwarzschild radius, but also cautions against oversimplifying the interpretation of R as merely a "radius." They suggest that 2πR relates to circumference instead.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the conceptual understanding of the Schwarzschild radius. Multiple viewpoints exist regarding its interpretation and the clarity of the underlying concepts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the specific aspects of the equation that are unclear, indicating a potential limitation in the discussion's focus on individual backgrounds and concerns.

Ryan Jackson
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I get how to derive black hole equations mathematically. But conceptually, how does it make sense that the radius of a black hole is 2MG/c^2, for example?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A conceptual, albeit incomplete way to understand why the radius of a black hole can be considered as what you stated is by considering that if nothing can escape a black hole (not really!), then the escape velocity of any particle from a black hole must be the speed of light which is the limiting speed. With this in mind the calculation is not very difficult to derive and can be done using familiar concepts in Newtonian mechanics.
 
Ryan Jackson said:
I get how to derive black hole equations mathematically.

Do you? The actual field equations are incredibly difficult to solve even for the simplest examples. Just look at this derivation of the Schwarzschild solution: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deriving_the_Schwarzschild_solution

Ryan Jackson said:
But conceptually, how does it make sense that the radius of a black hole is 2MG/c^2, for example?

As far as I understand, Schwarzschild found a solution to Einstein's field equations that gave the gravitational field surrounding a non-rotating, spherically symmetric body. One of the terms of this solution has the form ##\frac{1}{2m-r}## where ##m=\frac{GM}{c^2}## and ##r## is the distance from the center of the body.
The Schwarzschild radius is the value for ##r## such that this term becomes singular (undefined). This occurs when ##r=\frac{2GM}{c^2}## and the terms on the bottom of the fraction subtract to zero.

That's about the best I can do to explain why the Schwarzschild radius is what it is.
 
Ryan Jackson said:
I get how to derive black hole equations mathematically. But conceptually, how does it make sense that the radius of a black hole is 2MG/c^2, for example?

The derivation of any equation is the way you make sense of that equation. In other words, if you claim you understand the derivation that implies you understand the result. If you don't understand the result it's not possible to have understood the derivation because the result is part of the derivation!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
Ryan Jackson said:
I get how to derive black hole equations mathematically. But conceptually, how does it make sense that the radius of a black hole is 2MG/c^2, for example?

R=2GM/c^2 makes perfect conceptual sense. For instance, if you work out the units GM/c^2 has the proper units to be a length. (Type G*kg/c^2= into Google, for instance, which brings up Google Calculator and computes the units for you). I suppose you're saying you don't understand the equation - fair enough, but your question isn't specific enough for me to figure out what you don't understand, what your concerns are, or even what your background is, so I don't see how I can give a more helpful answer.

Interpreting R as a "radius" isn't quite right though, unfortunately. 2*pi*R can be interpreted as a circumference, though.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeterDonis

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
8K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K