Understanding Cauchy Sequences in Banach Spaces

dirk_mec1
Messages
755
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


http://img394.imageshack.us/img394/5994/67110701dt0.png

Homework Equations



A banach space is a complete normed space which means that every Cauchy sequence converges.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm stuck at exercise (c).

Suppose (f_n)_n is a Cauchy sequence in E. Then

|f_n-f_m| < \epsilon\ \forall\ n,m \leq N

so

|f'_n - f'_m| \leq |f'_n - f'_m|_{\infty} < \epsilonAm I going in the right direction?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have that backwards. ||fn-fm||_E<epsilon implies ||f'n-f'm||_infinity<epsilon. Can you use the fact the difference in derivatives of fn and fm is small to prove the difference between fn and fm is small? Hence that fn(x) is a cauchy sequence for each x?
 
Dick said:
You have that backwards. ||fn-fm||_E<epsilon implies ||f'n-f'm||_infinity<epsilon.
Really? I don't see why this is so.

Can you use the fact the difference in derivatives of fn and fm is small to prove the difference between fn and fm is small? Hence that fn(x) is a cauchy sequence for each x?
But what good will that do?



So here is the interpretation of the assignment in my eyes:

Given a Cauchy sequence (f_n)_n \in\ E prove that ||f_n-f||_E \rightarrow 0 and that f is in E.

So we have:

||f&#039;_n -f&#039;_m||_{\infty} &lt; \epsilon\ \forall m,n \geq N

and we want: ||f&#039;_n -f&#039;||_{\infty} \rightarrow 0\ \forall n \geq N

Is this correct?
 
Yes, that's it. Show f exists and has bounded derivative.
 
I'm sorry Dick, I have have been thinking about this but I can't seem to get f in E and converging.

Your posts imply that I should prove that f_n is a Cauchy sequence but what do I get from that? You also mention to use the deratives to prove that f_n is Cauchy: do you mean that I should use the definition of the derative?
 
You know there is a limiting function f', since f'_n(x) is a cauchy sequence in R for every x. So that sequence has a limit, define f'(x) to be that limit. f' is also continuous since it's a uniform limit of continuous functions. Once you have f' just define f to be the integral from 0 to x of f'(t)dt.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top