Understanding Charge Transfer in C & 2C Circuit

  • Thread starter Thread starter arpon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Circuit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding charge transfer in a circuit involving capacitors and inductors. The initial charge conditions on the capacitors are specified, with q_1 at 2q_0/3 and q_2 at q_0/3. The user seeks clarification on whether the currents i_1 and i_2 are affected by both capacitors, given the presence of a short circuit that isolates the loops. It is concluded that the short circuit creates isolated loops, preventing current from one loop from affecting the other. The user confirms that changes to the circuit configuration would not alter the currents i_1 and i_2.
arpon
Messages
234
Reaction score
16

Homework Statement


upload_2015-1-2_19-52-17.png
[/B]
C and 2C represent the capacitance of the respective capacitors. L and 2L represent the inductance of the respective inductors. Let, the charge on the capacitors GM and PM be q_1 and q_2 which are variable. t represents time. Initially (when the switch k was closed and t = 0) , q_1 = \frac{2q_0}{3} ; q_2 = \frac{q_0}{3}. Would it be,
i_1 = - \frac{dq_1}{dt} ; i_2 = - \frac{dq_2}{dt} ?
Explain your answer.

Homework Equations


That is conceptual question. No equation is needed.

The Attempt at a Solution


The actual homework was different. But I need to clear my concept before solving the actual problem. My confusion is, the MGHJ segment (which has the current i_1) is connected with both the capacitors. So, won't both the capacitor affect the current i_1 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The short circuit between M and J when the switch is closed effectively creates two isolated loops as no potential can develop across the short. In other words, M and J become a single node. No current from either loop can stray into the other loop past that short circuit.
 
  • Like
Likes arpon
gneill said:
The short circuit between M and J when the switch is closed effectively creates two isolated loops as no potential can develop across the short. In other words, M and J become a single node. No current from either loop can stray into the other loop past that short circuit.
So, if I change the circuit into the following , I think i_1 and i_2 won't change. Am I right?
upload_2015-1-2_21-11-15.png
 
Right.
 
  • Like
Likes arpon
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top