Understanding Complex Numbers: Squaring and Simplifying

AI Thread Summary
Complex numbers can be squared by treating the imaginary unit i as another variable, using the formula (a + ib)(c + id) = (ac - bd) + i(bc + ad). To simplify a rational number with an i term in the denominator, multiply both the numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate of the denominator, which eliminates the imaginary part in the denominator. This results in a real denominator and a complex number in the form a + ib. The discussion also includes a specific example of separating a complex expression into its real and imaginary components. Understanding these operations is essential for applications in fields like Physical Optics.
Master J
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
Hey guys.

So, complex numbers.

Its been a while since I've dealt with them. I've been wondering a few things about them.

When expressed in the form a + ib, is there a particular way that you square them?

And when you have a rational number, with an i term on the bottom, how exactly do you go about simplifying it into non rational form?


Cheers guys. I'm fairly rusty when it comes to the complex numbers. Hope this will clear some things up for me. I need to be fairly sharp at them now that I'm doing Physical Optics.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can treat the i like another variable. When you multiply two complex numbers, let's say a+ib and c+id, it is just like multiplying two binomials:

(a+ib)(c+id) = ac + aid + ibc + i2bd = (ac-bd) + i(bc+ad).

As for division (in the case of your rational number), what you want to do is to make the denominator real by multiplying top and bottom by the complex conjugate. For example, suppose you have (a+ib)/(c+id). The complex conjugate of c+id is c-id (the sign of the imaginary part is switched). When you multiply top and bottom by c-id, you will get:

[(ac+bd) + i(bc-ad)] / (c2 + d2)

The denominator is real, so you basically just have the solution as a complex number.
 
Cheers for the help. To make sure I have this, could someone perhaps show hoe this is separated into the form a + i b:


u - 1 = [N(e^2)] / [vm(g^2 - w^2 -iyw)]

Real: 1 + N(e^2)(g^2 - w^2) / [vm[(g^2 - w^2)^2 + (yw)^2]]


Imaginary: N(e^2)yw / [vm[(g^2 - w^2)^2 + (yw)^2]]
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top