Understanding Conventional Current and Electron Flow

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oerg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current
AI Thread Summary
In a D.C. circuit, conventional current flows from higher potential to lower potential, while electron flow moves in the opposite direction, from lower potential to higher potential. This apparent contradiction arises because conventional current is defined based on positive charge movement, despite electrons being negatively charged. The heat loss in wires is attributed to the movement of electrons, which indeed flow from a region of lower potential to higher potential, resulting in energy loss as they encounter resistance. The work done on electrons, calculated as q(V2-V1), aligns with this understanding, as the negative charge of electrons leads to a positive work done when moving against the electric field. This highlights the importance of considering charge polarity in electrostatic equations for a clearer conceptual understanding.
Oerg
Messages
350
Reaction score
0
Conventional Current?

Hi guys,

I have a pretty simple conceptual problem that has been bugging me for a while. In a D.C. circuit, the conventional current moves from higher potential to lower potential. But the electron flow is opposite that of the conventional current. That means that the electrons move from lower potential to higher potential?? How can that be possible, since the heat loss in the wires should arise in electron flow from higher to lower potential.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When a charge moves from potential V1 to V2, work done = q(V2-V1). This work done is manifested as heat loss. Since q for an electron is negative, V2-V1 is also negative to make work done positive, => v2<V1.
 
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh so you can consider charges with the polarity in the electrostatic equations! Well, i guess my teacher was too lazy and taught the topic using modulus.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top