Understanding E=mc^2: How Heat Affects Mass in Einstein's Theory of Relativity

  • Thread starter Thread starter pinkie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E=mc^2 Heat
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the impact of heat on mass, specifically whether a frying pan's mass changes when heated. It confirms that, according to Einstein's E=mc^2, the mass of an object increases with energy, meaning a hot frying pan has slightly more mass than a cold one. However, the change in mass is negligible and typically unmeasurable. Participants emphasize the importance of revisiting foundational concepts in physics and practicing problems to build understanding. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of learning physics and the satisfaction that comes with grasping complex ideas like mass-energy equivalence.
pinkie
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I posted this on the college board, but think it should go here. It is a college course, but at a high school level.
I feel kind of silly because this is probably a very basic problem, but I'm having problems with physics in general. Would anyone be able to tell me if I'm on the right track for the following question (we are focusing on Einstein's theories of relativity right now)?

1. Is the mass of a frying pan different when it is hot compared to when it is cold?

Yes it is, as E=mc^2 proves. Because the mass is equivalent to the energy of the object, when the energy increases, so does the mass. As energy increases when an object is heated, the mass of the pan will also increase when it is heated. The mass will decrease when the pan is cool and the energy has decreased.

~~
I hope I have this right. Lately I feel very hopeless at physics. Any help or comment would be very much appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pinkie said:
Yes it is, as E=mc^2 proves. Because the mass is equivalent to the energy of the object, when the energy increases, so does the mass. As energy increases when an object is heated, the mass of the pan will also increase when it is heated. The mass will decrease when the pan is cool and the energy has decreased.
Yes. You seem to grasp the essential point about mass-energy equivalence (as long as you understand that the change in mass is so small as to be unmeasureable).

Physics seems hard, in part, because it builds on concepts and principles. If you are having trouble, go back and redo something you think you really understand and work back up to the thing you are trying to understand. You will invariably find that there was something earlier that you thought you understood but didn't quite. Also work on problems, problems and more problems.

And then again physics seems hard because it is. But that just makes it all the more rewarding when you discover that you understand something new. Like E=mc^2.

AM
 
Thank you. I really appreciate the help. Physics is very new to me, so I guess you are right to tell me to practice. Thanks again. :)
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Using E=mc^2 does thermal energy add to an object's mass?
Replies
14
Views
3K
I Deriving e=mc^2, how is it possible?
Replies
2
Views
1K
Find the fractional increase in inertial mass when an ice cube melts
Replies
10
Views
2K
Calculating the Planck Length
Replies
3
Views
210
E=mc^2 Conversion to eV=u: What Happens to the Distance Units?
Replies
4
Views
5K
I Discover the Relationship Between Mass and Energy in Electromagnetic Fields
Replies
8
Views
2K
Finding relativistic mass and energy of an electron
Replies
14
Views
3K
Calculating Sun Mass Loss Over Time Using E=mc^2
Replies
12
Views
3K
B What is m in Kinetic Energy? Relativistic mass or Rest mass?
2
Replies
55
Views
5K
I Uncovering a Decent Proof of E=mc^2
Replies
14
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top