Understanding E(t) = wNBAsin(wt) and Its Variables

  • Thread starter Thread starter lampshader
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the equation E(t) = wNBAsin(wt) and its variables. Participants clarify that w represents angular frequency, A is the area, and N denotes the number of loops of wire. There is confusion regarding the variable B, which is identified as the magnetic field strength. The relationship between magnetic flux and induced electromotive force (emf) is also discussed, emphasizing that the emf is derived from the rate of change of magnetic flux. Overall, the conversation aims to clarify the definitions and roles of each variable in the equation.
lampshader
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Where can I find the defintion of the varaibles? I know w is the angular velocity, A is the Area, and t is time. but what are NB? is B the field strength? If that is so, then what is N?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi lampshader! :wink:

Number of turns? :smile:
 
Number of cycles?

If I were to calculate the angular velocity; w = number of 'turns' / time it makes the 'turns'.

So the denominator is used again as B in, E(t) = wNBAsin(wt)?

Thanks! =)
 
I thought that, when I open my simulation (homework assignment), their are default values and a peak voltage is displayed. So, when I use the equation: E(t) = wNBAsin(wt); and calculate by subsituting in the default values, I am not getting the displayed peak voltage. Ya know?
 
Hi lampshader! :smile:

(have an omega: ω :wink:)
lampshader said:
… If I were to calculate the angular velocity; w = number of 'turns' / time it makes the 'turns'.

ah … now i see …

no, ω isn't a geometrical angular velocity, it's the frequency, of the variable magnetic field, Bcos(ωt).

So the magnetic flux is φ = NBAcos(ωt), and the emf is E(t) = dφ/dt = ωNBAsin(ωt). :smile:

(And N is the number of loops of the wire round the area A)
 
Thanks, I appreciate your time.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top