Understanding elastic potential energy

AI Thread Summary
The formula for elastic potential energy, U = 1/2 k x^2, arises from the Taylor expansion of the potential energy function around the equilibrium position. The factor of 1/2 comes from calculating the work done by a variable force, specifically integrating the force over the distance. In this context, the average force is used, which leads to the inclusion of the 1/2 in the equation. The derivation assumes small displacements, allowing the approximation to hold true. Understanding this derivation clarifies the role of the 1/2 factor in the formula for elastic potential energy.
Heijbroek
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
where does the formula 1/2 Fx come from - i need to find out where the half comes from for some coursework of mine :S cheers,:cool:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you tried so far?
 
well its for an experiment i did - How does the speed of a catapulted trolley vary with distance pulled back? - as part of the task it says - word done or energy stored is 1/2Fx. THink why the 1/2 is in there - average? - yh tried a few sites didnt get v far...
 
Work done = average force times distance moved in direction of force.
 
It comes from the Taylor expansion of the potential energy function. We don't know what U(x) is, so we take the Taylor expansion of it around 0. You can add a constant to any potential energy function and it won't change the physics, so we can let the first term equal zero. If we define the equilibium position to be zero, then U'(0) must be 0 since it is in equilibrium. If it weren't zero, then it wouldn't be the equilibrium position. That leaves us with the third term, 1/2 kx^2, where k = U''(0). Terms beyond the third are ignored, since we assume that three terms of the Taylor expansion will be a good approximation for small displacements (which is was 1/2 kx^2 is valid for). That's where the 1/2 comes from.
 
F = -kx

Work = F*x
Work for variable force = integral (F dx)
W = integral (-kx dx) = -k integral(x dx) = -1/2k x^2

W = -1/2k x^2
U = -W = 1/2 k x^2
 
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Back
Top