Understanding Empirical Formulas & Ions: 2 Questions Answered

  • Thread starter Thread starter omni
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formulas Ions
AI Thread Summary
To write an empirical formula, identify the simplest ratio of atoms in a compound, such as C2H6 simplifying to CH3. Aluminum (Al) has the same empirical formula as its elemental form since it is a single atom. Barium (Ba) will form a cation by losing electrons, while phosphorus (P) will form an anion by gaining electrons. The ability of an element to lose or gain electrons can generally be determined by consulting the periodic table. Understanding these concepts is essential for grasping empirical formulas and ion formation.
omni
Messages
192
Reaction score
1
2 Questions please

hello.
i need help to Understand how can i Write Empirical formula for Al or in general how to Write Empirical formula?

2)i also need help to Understand how can i know what Ion i will get from Ba and P ?



i think for ba is will be Negative because there more Electron. but i dosen't understand it very well.

hope u can help me.
thanks :).
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Empirical formula is the simplest ratio of number of atoms in the compound.
For a compound C2H6, the empirical formula is CH3
Al is a single atom. Its empirical formula will be same i.e. Al
 


Formation of cation or anion does not depends on the number of electrons in atom. As Ba is metal it has property to lose electron. It will form cation while P is non-metal is accept electron. It will form anion.
 


hi thanks for ur Answers but i mean Al and N Together.

In General how can i know what element is property to lose electron and what element is accept electron ?

there is any rule for it?
thanks.
 


omni said:
hi thanks for ur Answers but i mean Al and N Together.

Al and N what?

In General how can i know what element is property to lose electron and what element is accept electron ?

there is any rule for it?

It is enough to consult periodic table.
 


ok i Understand.

thanks to all.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top