Understanding Exponential Terms in Quantum Mechanics Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding exponential terms in a quantum mechanics problem related to scattering amplitudes and electric dipoles. Participants are trying to clarify steps in a solution found online, particularly focusing on the manipulation of exponential terms within integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss variable changes in integrals and how these affect the exponential terms. Questions arise regarding the justification for combining separate integrals after changing variables. Some participants express confusion about specific steps in the solution and seek further clarification on convergence of integrals.

Discussion Status

Several participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering explanations and confirming each other's understanding. There is a productive exchange of ideas, with some participants providing insights into the mathematical reasoning behind the steps taken in the solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which includes specific tasks related to calculating scattering amplitudes and understanding the behavior of integrals in quantum mechanics. The original problem involves an electric dipole and its interaction with a charged particle.

NightHaWk
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Consider an electric dipole consisting of two electric charges e and −e at a mutual distance 2a.
Consider also a particle of charge e and mass m with an incident wave vector k perpendicular to
the direction of the dipole.

1. Calculate the scattering amplitude in the Born approximation. Find the directions at which
the differential cross section is maximal.
Relevant Equations
-
So I am trying to understand and solve the problem mentioned in the title.I found a solution online:

https://physics.bgu.ac.il/COURSES/QuantumMechCohen/ExercisesPool/EXERCISES/ex_9011_sol_Y09.pdf

The problem is, I can't understand this step :

Image 1.png


I relly can't find out how the two expontential terms in the parenthesis show up. Any help greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Change of variables.
The first term he changed to ##r \mapsto r+a## and the second term you know what to do, don't you? ;-)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and NightHaWk
If you could explain the second term as well i would be grateful because I still cannot get the same result as the given solution :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Ok, I'll explain.
If you change variables ##r'=r+a## you get that ##r=r'-a##, so the exponential in the integral becomes
##e^{ir\cdot q} = e^{i(r'-a)\cdot q}##, and because you now integrate over ##r'## (the Jacobian of this change of variables is one), ##|r+a|=|r'|##.

With the second term you use ##r\mapsto r-a##, simple isn't it? :-)
 
MathematicalPhysicist said:
Ok, I'll explain.
If you change variables ##r'=r+a## you get that ##r=r'-a##, so the exponential in the integral becomes
##e^{ir\cdot q} = e^{i(r'-a)\cdot q}##, and because you now integrate over ##r'## (the Jacobian of this change of variables is one), ##|r+a|=|r'|##.

With the second term you use ##r\mapsto r-a##, simple isn't it? :-)
So you basically mean we first break up the integral to a sum of two integrals, then do a separate change of variable to each integral, and then reunite the two integrals? Yes I think it is correct if the domain of integration is whole ##\mathbb{R^3}##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NightHaWk and Delta2
That is what I was wondering about the second term, I did the separete change of variable,but I could not justify the reunion under one common integral.Thank you very much for the help!
 
NightHaWk said:
Homework Statement:: Consider an electric dipole consisting of two electric charges e and −e at a mutual distance 2a.
Consider also a particle of charge e and mass m with an incident wave vector k perpendicular to
the direction of the dipole.

1. Calculate the scattering amplitude in the Born approximation. Find the directions at which
the differential cross section is maximal.
Relevant Equations:: -

So I am trying to understand and solve the problem mentioned in the title.I found a solution online:

https://physics.bgu.ac.il/COURSES/QuantumMechCohen/ExercisesPool/EXERCISES/ex_9011_sol_Y09.pdf

The problem is, I can't understand this step :

View attachment 250782

I relly can't find out how the two expontential terms in the parenthesis show up. Any help greatly appreciated.
In the same solution, can someone please explain how the integral that shows up later converges? After integrating over cos(theta) you get something oh the integral(sin(qr),r,0,inf). They somehow integrated this in the pdf
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd
It's the Fourier transform of a Coulomb potential. The most simple solution is to solve for
$$\Delta \Phi=-\delta^{(3)}(\vec{x})$$
with the solution
$$\Phi(\vec{x})=\frac{1}{4 \pi r}.$$
In Fourier space, writing
$$\Phi(\vec{x})=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \frac{\mathrm{d}^3 q}{(2 \pi)^3} \tilde{\Phi}(\vec{q}).$$
Then from the equation you get
$$-\vec{q}^2 \tilde{\Phi}=-1 \; \Rightarrow \; \tilde{\Phi}(\vec{q})=\frac{1}{\vec{q}^2}.$$
To check we evaluate the Fourier integral
$$\Psi(\vec{x})=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 q \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^3 q^2} \exp(\mathrm{i} \vec{q} \cdot \vec{x}).$$
In spherical coordinates with ##u=\cos \vartheta## and ##\vec{x} = r \vec{e}_z## we have
$$\Psi(\vec{x}) = \frac{1}{4 \pi^2} \int_0^{\infty} \mathrm{d} q \int_{-1}^1 \mathrm{d} u \exp(\mathrm{i} q r u) = \frac{1}{2 \pi^2 r} \int_0^{\infty} \mathrm{d} q \frac{\sin(q r)}{q}=\frac{1}{4 \pi r}=\Phi(\vec{x}.$$
QED.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K