Understanding Friction and Kinetic Energy: Solving a Skier's Velocity Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter tibug
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the skier's velocity at point B, given an initial velocity and a constant frictional force. The relevant equations include kinetic energy and the conservation of energy principle, which relates initial and final kinetic energy to work done against friction. The confusion arises from the need to divide by the skier's mass to maintain consistent units when applying the equations. The correct approach involves substituting the frictional force directly into the energy equation instead of using mass and a friction coefficient. Ultimately, the calculations confirm that the skier's velocity at point B is approximately 31 m/s, clarifying the mathematical reasoning behind the unit conversions.
tibug
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Well, I've got the right answer on this problem, but I don't know if/why the math makes sense. I feel like I got the right answer by coincidence.

I'm rephrasing the question because it's part of a multipart question.

A skier with mass of 100kg starts at point A with a velocity of 31.3m/s. Find the skier's velocity at point B if the distance between A and B is 20m and a constant frictional force of 50N opposes his motion.



K=1/2mg2

v=√(v02-2μκmgx

Those are the equations I thought relevant.

The first equation, K=1/2mg2 is what I used to get the skier's velocity at A (previous part of the problem), which is 31.3m/s. 31.3m/s is correct; I have the answers.

Also, from the second equation, √(31.32-(2x50Nx20m)/100kg))=30.98m/s ≈ 31m/s

I also know that 31 m/s is correct, because again, I have the answers. But I am particularly confused about why I divided by 100kg. I was trying to find a way to get rid of the "kg" in the Newton unit so I would have like units in both terms. Dividing by 100kg works to make the units match, but I don't understand if/why it works to get the right answer.

I appreciate any guidance. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re do the math - and use the "units of a Newton" as appropriate. On any mathematical problem where units become confusing - make sure you are using the most fundamental units available.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
That second equation comes from conservation of energy: The final kinetic energy of the skier is equal to the initial kinetic energy added to the work done on the skier/
The work done is force times displacement. It's negative since the force is inthe opposite direction as the displacement. Since the force is simply given, and you don't have to compute it from the mass of the skier and a friction coefficient, it doesn't involve mass, and you should replace \mu_k g m in your second equation with F (wich is 50 Newton)

Since kinetic energy is (1/2)mv^2, conservation of energy means:

\frac{1}{2}m v_i^2 - F x = \frac{1}{2}m v_f^2

divide this by (1/2)m, and you see why you end up with 2 F x/m.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
tibug said:
I also know that 31 m/s is correct, because again, I have the answers. But I am particularly confused about why I divided by 100kg.
Check the dimensions of your eqn v = √vo2-2μkmgx.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you very much all of you! I get the concept now. My mind was just stuck in a rut, I think. Once confused, I am not easily unconfused.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top