Understanding Gas Laws: Boyle's, Charles', and the Conceptual 'What If' Question

AI Thread Summary
Boyle's Law states that pressure is inversely proportional to volume at constant temperature, while Charles' Law indicates that volume is directly proportional to temperature at constant pressure. The discussion centers on a conceptual "what if" scenario where increasing the volume of an ideal gas seems to conflict with temperature and pressure relationships. It clarifies that Boyle's and Charles' Laws are simplifications that assume constant conditions for other variables, which is why the initial thought experiment was flawed. To analyze changes in multiple variables, the ideal gas law (PV=nRT) and the energy-temperature relationship (U=cRT) should be used for a more accurate understanding.
pibomb
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
This is an absurd question, but the answer is beyond me:

According to Boyle's Law, we get the relationship: P=k/V (k=constant)
According to Charles' Law, we get: V/T=k
And, P/T=k

My question is rather an conceptual "what if": if we increase, say, the volume of the an ideal gas, it's pressure would go down. Yet, an increase in volume should lead to an increase in temperature, and this an increase in pressure. This can't be right, and though I know I'm missing something fundamental, I can't figure out what that is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is you are considering two different conditions; one at V1 and another at V2.

Charles law for two conditions is V1/T1=V2/T2 and P1/T1=P2/T2.

Hope this helps.
 
Oh I see, thanks.
 
This is not an absurd question at all. But here is the problem: Boyle's and Charles' Laws are simplifications of a more complex relationship for ideal gases. To stay simple, each Law needs to assume that all other variables are constant. For example, P=k/V assumes constant temperature, V/T=k assumes constant pressure, and P/T=k assumes constant volume. This is why your thought experiment didn't work.

So if you want to work with changes in multiple variables (which is usually the case in real systems), you need the more general equations

pV=nRT\quad\quad U=cRT

the first of which is the ideal gas law and the second is the relationship between energy and temperature for an ideal gas.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top