Understanding Geiger-Muller Counters: How Do They Detect Radiation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blockmeister
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Counter
AI Thread Summary
The detection of radiation by a Geiger-Muller counter primarily relies on the ability of an ionized gas to carry an electrical charge, making option b the correct choice. This process involves ionization when radiation passes through the gas, leading to a measurable electrical signal. Other options, such as the emission of photons or sound detection, do not accurately describe the fundamental working principle of the counter. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the mechanisms behind radiation detection rather than just identifying the correct answer. Clarifying these concepts can enhance comprehension of how Geiger-Muller counters function in radiation detection.
Blockmeister
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Detection of radiation by a Geiger-Muller counter depends on what?
a.
the emission of a photon from an excited atom
b.
the ability of an ionized gas to carry an electrical charge
c.
the detection of the sound made by decay particles
d.
the ability of a photomultiplier tube to amplify the electrical signal from a phosphor
e.
the emission of a photon of light by the radioactive particle

I think it is b, but the wording is what throws me off.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Blockmeister said:

Homework Statement


Detection of radiation by a Geiger-Muller counter depends on what?
a.
the emission of a photon from an excited atom
b.
the ability of an ionized gas to carry an electrical charge
c.
the detection of the sound made by decay particles
d.
the ability of a photomultiplier tube to amplify the electrical signal from a phosphor
e.
the emission of a photon of light by the radioactive particle

I think it is b, but the wording is what throws me off.

You might be right. But can you explain your reasoning as to why it might be (b), and why the correct answer would not be any of the others?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top