Understanding h_{ie}: Emitter Current Gain in a Voltage Follower

  • Thread starter Thread starter DragonPetter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Gain
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the term h_{ie}, which represents the resistance of the base-emitter junction in a BJT voltage follower circuit. It is clarified that h_{ie} varies based on the base current and typically ranges from 250 ohms to 8000 ohms, with a common assumption of 500 ohms for calculations. The gain of a voltage follower is slightly less than 1 and is minimally affected by h_{ie}. The conversation also highlights the importance of feedback, specifically through emitter degeneration, to achieve a more predictable gain in common emitter amplifiers. Understanding h_{ie} and its relationship to other parameters is crucial for accurate transistor circuit design.
DragonPetter
Messages
830
Reaction score
1
I am going through some notes on a very simple BJT circuit setup as a voltage follower. It is simply an NPN with its collector connected to a voltage source, its base connected to a signal, and its emitter connected to a load resistor to ground.

A schematic is attached.

Now he setup a list of equations for this circuit:

1. i_{b} = \frac{V_{b}-V_{e}}{h_{ie}}

2. i_{c} = h_{fe}i_{b}

3. i_{e} = i_{c} + i_{b}

4. V_{e} = i_{e}R_{L}

I am familiar with equations 2-4. I am not so sure about equation 1. I am not familiar with the term h_{ie} nor the relationship.

I can infer that the h_{ie} term must have units of ohms, so it is different from the beta gain term I am used to seeing.

Can anyone explain what this term is and where the relationship comes from?
 

Attachments

  • voltage follower.png
    voltage follower.png
    14 KB · Views: 443
Engineering news on Phys.org
Ok, I worked the transfer function out and then looking in my electronics book, I see that the term matches up with the r_{\pi} term in the Hybrid-pi model of a transistor, which is equal to \frac{h_{fe}}{g_{m}} which is the transconductance.

Now this is something that has always confused me as a disconnect between my textbooks and transistor datasheets . . along with other paremeters used extensively in my books, there is no term called transconductance in datasheets, and according to my textbook, this can vary as the collector current varies . . so how could I ever design a real gain that I want with a real transitor that doesn't give me this parameter?
 
Last edited:
hie is the resistance of the base emitter junction and it is normally given in data sheets.

I have a data sheet for a 2N2222 and this value depends on the base current chosen, but it is in the range of 250 ohms to 8000 ohms. This variation is due to the B-E junction being a diode which is being turned on by a DC current.
For calculations if you don't know this value, you can assume about 500 ohms.

If there is no feedback, the gain of a common emitter amplifier depends on this value so it is important. If a more accurate gain is required, then you would use feedback.
One easy way to apply feedback is to have an unbypassed emitter resistor in a CE amplifier. Gain is then approximately equal to (collector resistor / emitter resistor)

The gain on a voltage follower is only slightly dependent on hie and it will always be slightly less than 1.
 
vk6kro said:
hie is the resistance of the base emitter junction and it is normally given in data sheets.

I have a data sheet for a 2N2222 and this value depends on the base current chosen, but it is in the range of 250 ohms to 8000 ohms. This variation is due to the B-E junction being a diode which is being turned on by a DC current.
For calculations if you don't know this value, you can assume about 500 ohms.

If there is no feedback, the gain of a common emitter amplifier depends on this value so it is important. If a more accurate gain is required, then you would use feedback.
One easy way to apply feedback is to have an unbypassed emitter resistor in a CE amplifier. Gain is then approximately equal to (collector resistor / emitter resistor)

The gain on a voltage follower is only slightly dependent on hie and it will always be slightly less than 1.

Thank you for the thorough answer.

Now, I understand that the resistor at the emitter is called "emitter degeneration" and actually creates an inherent negative feedback in the first place. When you say add feedback to get an accurate gain, do you mean other than this inherent feedback?
 
No, that is one method of applying feedback and it is effective at establishing a predictable gain even though the transistors used may have different current gains.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top