Understanding Laplace Transforms: Solving Problems and Applying Properties

LostEngKid
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi all, 2 questions here

1) I've been doing some questions on laplace transforms and have been running into some trouble getting my answers into the same form as the answers given with the questions.
For example:

f(t) = 1 - e^(-t)
Using the linearity property i got 1/s - 1/(s-1) which is correct? But the answers give 1/s(s-1). Later in the lecture notes they show how to do the inverse laplace transform of the answer they gave and use partial fractions to get it into the form of the answer I got, i was just wondering what they have done to go from my answer to their answer, what steps am i missing?

2) f(t) = sinhtcosht, does this involve convolution or is that only when doing the inverse laplace transform where L(f)L(g) = f(t)*g(t)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Its been a while since I've looked at Laplace transforms, but is the LT of e^-t not 1/(s+1) instead of 1/(s-1)?
 
1) Try and simplify your expression using a common denominator of s and (s-1).

2) Do you know the definition of sinh(t) and cosh(t) in terms of exponentials?
 
oops yeah i did mean 1/(s+1) danago

and Pere i wouldn't have a clue about sinh(t) and cosh(t) a exponentials, maybe i should have paid more attention in first year maths
 
LostEngKid said:
oops yeah i did mean 1/(s+1) danago

and Pere i wouldn't have a clue about sinh(t) and cosh(t) a exponentials, maybe i should have paid more attention in first year maths


If you don't know about the definition of sinh(t) I don't see how you could calculate its LT..

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \sinh t =&amp; \frac{e^t-e^{-t}}{2}\\<br /> \cosh t =&amp; \frac{e^t+e^{-t}}{2}<br /> \end{align}<br />

For some background reading you could have a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbolic_trigonometric_function" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There should be a table of Laplace transforms which you can refer to check LT of sinh and cosh. But in any case, Pere Callahan's post is sufficient for you to do it, so long as you know the LT of e^t and e^-t.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top