Understanding Line in R^3 Parallel to XY-Plane: Help Needed

AI Thread Summary
A line in R^3 is parallel to the xy-plane if its direction vector has a zero z-component, meaning it can be expressed as (v1, v2, 0) with v1 and v2 not both equal to zero. This indicates that the line lies flat within the xy-plane but does not align with either the x-axis or y-axis unless one of the components is zero. If v1 is zero, the line is parallel to the y-axis, and if v2 is zero, it is parallel to the x-axis. Understanding this helps in formulating the parametric and symmetric equations for such lines. The key takeaway is that a line parallel to the xy-plane maintains a constant z-value while varying in the x and y directions.
kerrwilk
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
What does it mean if a line in R^3 is parallel to the xy-plane but not to any of the axes. I really don't know what this means in terms of how the parametric and symmetric equations of the line should look. Please help. Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A line in R^3 can be described by a parametric equation of the form

\textbf{r}(t) = \textbf{r}_0+t\textbf{v},

where \textbf{r}_0 is the position vector representing a point in \mathbb{R}^3, t is a real number, and \textbf{v} is a non-zero displacement vector indicating the direction of the line (and also its orientation: which way along the line is positive).

The condition for this line to be parallel to the xy-plane is that the z-component of \textbf{v} is zero. That is, \textbf{v} must be of the form (v1,v2,0), where v1 and v2 are fixed real numbers, not both 0. Suppose this is the case. If, and only if, v1 is 0, the line will be parallel to the y-axis. If, and only if, v2 is 0, the line will be parallel to the x-axis.
 
Thanks! That was a great explanation.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
21K
Replies
13
Views
264
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top