Understanding Method of Sections: Why is Fy=2T2 - 981? | WikiBooks

  • Thread starter Thread starter On Radioactive Waves
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding the equation Fy=2T2 - 981 in the context of the method of sections in statics. The user is unclear about the origin of the factor of 2 in the equation, questioning why it is not simply T2. They express difficulty in grasping the concept and seek clarification to aid in completing their homework. Other participants indicate that the equation presented is incorrect, suggesting that the user may need to review the underlying principles of the method of sections. Overall, the conversation highlights a common misunderstanding in applying the method of sections to solve static equilibrium problems.
On Radioactive Waves
Messages
136
Reaction score
0
Okay, so I am trying to understand the method of sections so I can finish my homework. I look at http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Statics/Method_of_Sections" and for the life of me, I can't understand why at the bottom of the page it says Fy=0=2T2 - 981 .

Where does the factor of 2 come from? Why not just T2? I feel like I am missing something completely obvious. Sorry for the poor notation.

I am posting this here because it is not my homework problem, and there is no work for me to show. I would just appreciate an answer, so I can do my homework. I'm totally missing the bus on this concept right now...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »

Thread 'Do electron density waves accompany EM waves in coaxial cables?'

Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
View full post »

Similar threads

Engineering Moment of a force about point O
Replies
4
Views
3K
Static variable in static method - how to use?
Replies
3
Views
1K
I How is the direction of a harmonic wave expressed?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Calculating Residue at -2: Math Methods w/ Arfken et al.
Replies
4
Views
1K
Understanding Tension on a Pulley
Replies
6
Views
2K
I How to understand experiment to measure heat capacity of solid?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Virtual Work and Static Equilibrium
Replies
3
Views
2K
Why is there a vertical force on the pin in this static equilibrium setup?
Replies
8
Views
2K
Is There an Easier Method for Solving Truss Problems?
Replies
1
Views
2K
A Puzzled about Section 3.12 of Jackson's E&M book
Replies
18
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top