Understanding Newton's Laws in Non-Inertial Reference Frames

pkc111
Messages
224
Reaction score
26
Hi,

I was wondering if someone could explain things simply to me (sorry, I am a high school science teacher and not really into the high level maths side of things).

I would like to ask if the General Theory of Relativity says anything about objects obeying Newtons Laws in non-inertial reference frames. A lot of the sources I've come across say that it confirms that Newtons Laws are obeyed in ALL reference frames - including non-inertial ones -hence its name "General" theory of relativity.

But I don't get how the laws are obeyed in a car accelerating from a traffic light- where objects appear to change their motion without an applied force.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

The general theory of relativity is based on the equivalence principle that says that acceleration is equivalent to a gravity field. If, for this discussion, we ignore Earth gravity, an accelerating car can be considered stationary in a constant uniform gravity field. Everything outside the car is free-falling in this gravity field and constantly accelerating backwards. Things inside the car are either free-falling in it, or held by the matter of the car that applies a force equals to m*a on them.

You can read about general relativity here:

http://www.polarhome.com:763/~rafimoor/english/GRE.htm

The article is informal and does not use higher mathematics.

Regards
Rafi
 
Last edited by a moderator:
pkc111 said:
Hi,



But I don't get how the laws are obeyed in a car accelerating from a traffic light- where objects appear to change their motion without an applied force.

Thanks.

They do have a force - its the frictional force - If you put your briefcase on the car seat and accelerate your car - the briefcase also gets accelerated because it is pushed by the friction of the seat or becasue it contacts the backrest - try putting some wheels or bearings on your lose items in the car and accelerate - they want to stay at rest so they slide backward when you accelerate forward - when you are stopping, they slide forward. Things at rest stay at rest unless acted upon by some force.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top