Understanding Optics: Why is 2t changed to 2tn in problem 35.54?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics
AI Thread Summary
In problem 35.54, the equation changes from 2t to 2tn to account for the difference in wavelengths of light in air versus glass. While the physical distance light travels remains 2t, the wavelength in air is shorter due to the refractive index, necessitating the multiplication by n. This adjustment reflects the relationship between wavelengths in different media, where n represents the ratio of the wavelength in air to that in glass. The discussion clarifies that the change is not about distance but about how many wavelengths correspond to that distance in different materials. Understanding this distinction is crucial for solving optics problems accurately.
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi all.

Please take a look at page 4 in this PDF, namely problem 35.54: http://faculty.physics.tamu.edu/hu/221-fl08/YF-ch35-exmpls-new.pdf

My questions is: Why is it that the equation 2t = (m+\frac{1}{2})\pi is changed to 2tn = (m+\frac{1}{2})\pi?

I know it is because we are in air now, but the light still travels a distance of 2t, and not 2tn? Can you explain this to me?Thank you very much in advance.Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The issue is not the distance, but how many wavelengths it corresponds to. The distance in the glass is 2t, so you'd express that as some multiple of wavelengths in the glass. If instead you want your equation in terms of wavelengths in air, then you need to multiply by n. (Since the wavelength decreases by a factor of n when entering the glass.)
 
I am not entirely sure I understand your post. Am I correct when I say that what you wrote is essentially

<br /> 2t = (m+\frac{1}{2})\lambda_{glass}<br />

AND<br /> 2tn = (m+\frac{1}{2})\lambda_{air}<br />

and this is because we have n=\lambda_{air}/\lambda_{glass} (approximately)?
 
Last edited:
Exactly.
 
Thanks. I had a hectic day today, and it means a lot that you responded so swiftly.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top