Understanding Percolation Threshold p_c on Triangular Lattices

bubbloy
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
i am having some trouble understanding the meaning of what a percolation threshold is p_{c}.
apparently on triangular lattices a threshold of 0.5 is the result on any sized lattice.
however i can definitely think of a way to fill in half the points on a triangle lattice and not have it span across the lattice.
similarly, one could make a zig zag line of connected sites to span a lattice without using anywhere near 1/2 the points. so is the percolation threshold a number at which you can expect to see percolation?

all the books I am reading seem to say that above it everything has a percolating net and below it there are no possible percolating nets.

thanks a lot,

josh S
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well in case anyone was wondering, the percolation threshold is the probability with which you need to fill in the nodes on a lattice so that in the limit of an infinite lattice, there is a non zero chance that you will have a spanning cluster going across it. for example, one could construct a spanning cluster across an infinite lattice by connecting a line of edges across the whole thing and in this example the probability you fill the lattice with is 0 (one row/infinite rows) but the probability of this happening is so low that it does not survive in the infinite limit.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
10K
Back
Top