Understanding Separable First-Order Differential Equations

PhysicsMark
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The following is an explanation from my tutorial. I do not understand it.

{\frac{d}{dx}(y_1{{y_2}'}-y_2{{y_1}'})+P(x)(y_1{{y_2}'}-y_2{{y_1}'})=0

Overlooking for the moment that P(x) may be undefined at certain values of x(so-called-singular points of the equation), we recognize this equation to be a separable first-order differential equation for the function y_1{{y_2}'}-y_2{{y_1}'} that can be integrated to give:

y_1{{y_2}'}-y_2{{y_1}'}= C_{12}(exp(-{\int{P(x')dx'}})

y_1{{y_2}'}-y_2{{y_1}'}= C_{12}\phi[P]

Where C_{12} is an integration constant that depends, possibly, on the choices of functions y_1 and y_2, and phi[P] is a functional, that is, a function that depends upon another function, in this case, P(x). The expression on the left hand side is called the Wronskian of the functions y_1 and y_2.

I do not understand how they separate this equation. Here is what I do. I first separate like this:
{\frac{d}{dx}(y_1{{y_2}'}-y_2{{y_1}'})=-P(x)(y_1{{y_2}'}-y_2{{y_1}'})

Then I multiply both sides by dx. Next I divide both sides by y_1{{y_2}'}-y_2{{y_1}'}

Then I have:

{\int{1}d}=-{\int{P(x)dx}

What am I doing wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't just divide by y1y2'-y2y1' and have it cancel out from d/dx(y1y2'-y2y1')

Let's do it your way

\frac{d}{dx}(y_1y_2'-y_2y_1')+P(x)(y_1y_2'-y_2y_1')=0

\Rightarrow \frac{d}{dx}(y_1y_2'-y_2y_1')= -P(x)(y_1y_2'-y_2y_1')

now if we divide by y1y2'-y2y1' we will get


\frac{1}{y_1y_2'-y_2y_1'} \frac{d}{dx}(y_1y_2'-y_2y_1') = -P(x)

Now because the term on the left is a tad bit confusing, let's simplify it and let z=y1y2'-y2y1'. So our equation becomes

\frac{1}{z} \frac{dz}{dx}= -P(x) \Rightarrow \frac{1}{z} dz = -P(x)dx

now you can integrate both sides. I am sure you can get z isolated on the left side.

Then replace 'z'.


Alternatively what you can do is multiply both sides of the original differential equation by an integrating factor of e∫P(x) dx.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top