Understanding Signs of Net Force in Mass-Spring Systems

AI Thread Summary
In mass-spring systems, the net force is determined by the balance of gravitational force (mg) acting downward and the spring's restoring force (-kx) acting upward. Regardless of the chosen sign convention, the spring force always acts in the opposite direction to the displacement from its equilibrium position. When using upward as positive, the spring force is +kx and gravity is -mg, leading to the equation kx - mg = 0. Conversely, if downward is considered positive, the spring force becomes -kx and gravity +mg, resulting in -kx + mg = 0. Understanding the signs relies on recognizing that Hooke's law indicates the direction of the restoring force relative to displacement.
chattymatty
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I am having trouble with a simple concept...trying to figure out the signs of net force of a mass on a spring.

I understand that for a mass on the spring, there is a downward force of gravity (mg) and upwards restoring force of the (-kx). How do we equate these, if we regard the positive direction in the same direction as gravity? How would we equate these, if we, in contrast, regard the positive direction in the same direction as the restoring force?

I believe that the final conclusion will be mg = kx. But where are the signs? How did the signs cancel out?

Thank you!
Chatty Matty
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At the equilibrium position, the net force on the mass is zero.

The thing to realize is that regardless of sign convention the spring force acts up (magnitude kx, where x is the distance below the unstretched position) and gravity acts down. What might be throwing you off is the minus sign in Hooke's law: F = -kx. The minus sign just tells you the direction of the restoring force with respect to displacement x. (If x is down, F is up.)

Using up as positive, the spring force is +kx and gravity is -mg. Add them up to get: kx - mg = 0.

Using down as positive, the spring force is -kx and gravity is +mg. Add them: -kx + mg = 0.
 
Hi Doc Al,

When considering the forces, how come we did not consider the minus sign in Hooke's law? So when we consider the spring force (whether we take up or down being positive), is the spring force just "kx"? Depending on the direction we take as positive/negative will dictate then the a +kx or -kx, and not from Hooke's law?

Thanks!
 
Hooke's law tells you the actual direction of the force. (Not by blinding plugging into the equation, but by understanding it.) The force is always opposite to the direction of the stretch (or compression) with respect to the unstretched position. If you pull the spring in one direction, the restoring force points in the opposite direction.

The magnitude of that force is always just kx (where x is taken as positive); the sign that you use depends on the coordinate system and sign convention that you are using.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
56
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top