Understanding Strain in Different Directions: Is AD = AC cos theta?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chetzread
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Strain
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between strains in different directions, specifically whether the change in length of segment AD can be expressed as δAD = δAC cos θ. Participants explore the implications of this relationship within the context of geometry and calculus, raising questions about the correctness of the initial assumptions and calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of δAD = δAC cos θ, suggesting instead that δAC = δAD cos θ might be correct based on their understanding of trigonometric relationships in non-vertical and non-horizontal lines.
  • Another participant asserts that the distance between points C and D does not change, prompting further inquiry into the implications of this constancy on the relationship between AD and AC.
  • Participants utilize the Pythagorean theorem to derive the relationship between distances AD and AC, leading to the expression AD = sqrt(L^2 + x^2).
  • There is a discussion about the derivative of the distance AD with respect to changes in AC, leading to the conclusion that δAD can be expressed in terms of δAC and the cosine of the angle θ.
  • One participant expresses confusion over the application of the cosine relationship, questioning how AD could equal AC cos θ given specific numerical values for AD and AC.
  • Another participant clarifies that the relationship discussed pertains to changes in length (δ) rather than the lengths themselves, emphasizing that δAD = δAC cos θ is not the same as stating AD = AC cos θ.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach consensus on the initial claim regarding the relationship between δAD and δAC. Multiple competing views remain, particularly concerning the interpretation of trigonometric relationships and the implications of constant distances in the context of strain.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of the angles and lengths involved, as well as the conditions under which the relationships hold true. The discussion also reflects varying levels of familiarity with calculus and trigonometry among participants.

chetzread
Messages
798
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


In this question , I am not convinced that δAD = δAC cos theta

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


, i think it should be
δAC = δAD cos theta , am i right ?
I think so because we normally get the non-vertical and non -horizontal line and then cos the angle or sin the angle to get the length in x and y direction , right ?
[/B]
 

Attachments

  • 386.PNG
    386.PNG
    21.3 KB · Views: 420
Physics news on Phys.org
No. You're not right. Call L the distance between C and D. Does this distance change?
 
no
Chestermiller said:
No. You're not right. Call L the distance between C and D. Does this distance change?
no , the distance doesn't chnage , so ?
 
Call x the distance from A to C. Using the Pythagorean theorem, in terms of L and x, what is the distance between A and D?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chetzread
Chestermiller said:
Call x the distance from A to C. Using the Pythagorean theorem, in terms of L and x, what is the distance between A and D?

AD = sqrt ( L^2 + x^2 )
 
chetzread said:
AD = sqrt ( L^2 + x^2 )
Good. Now, if the distance between A and C changes by dx, in terms of L, x, and dx, by how much does the distance between A and D change?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chetzread
can you
Chestermiller said:
Good. Now, if the distance between A and C changes by dx, in terms of L, x, and dx, by how much does the distance between A and D change?
can you give some hint , i have no idea
 
Have you had calculus?
 
Chestermiller said:
Have you had calculus?
yes , and ?
 
  • #10
chetzread said:
yes , and ?
Apparently, that wasn't a big enough hint. What is the derivative with respect to x of ##\sqrt{L^2+x^2}##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chetzread
  • #11
Chestermiller said:
Apparently, that wasn't a big enough hint. What is the derivative with respect to x of ##\sqrt{L^2+x^2}##?
Chestermiller said:
Apparently, that wasn't a big enough hint. What is the derivative with respect to x of ##\sqrt{L^2+x^2}##?
0.5(2x) (1/ ##\ sqrt{L^2+x^2}## )
 
  • #12
chetzread said:
0.5(2x) (1/ ##\ sqrt{L^2+x^2}## )
What is 0.5(2x) equal to?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chetzread
  • #13
Chestermiller said:
What is 0.5(2x) equal to?
X
 
  • #14
You really need to learn to use LaTex to display your equations. The current way you do it is totally unacceptable. Here is the link: https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/
Use LaTex from now on.

As far as the derivative of ##\sqrt{L^2+x^2}## is concerned, you obtained:$$\frac{x}{\sqrt{L^2+x^2}}$$Is that what you meant?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chetzread
  • #15
Chestermiller said:
You really need to learn to use LaTex to display your equations. The current way you do it is totally unacceptable. Here is the link: https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/
Use LaTex from now on.

As far as the derivative of ##\sqrt{L^2+x^2}## is concerned, you obtained:$$\frac{x}{\sqrt{L^2+x^2}}$$Is that what you meant?
Yes, so , what are you trying to say?
 
  • #16
chetzread said:
Yes, so , what are you trying to say?
You still don't see it, huh?

Well, if dx is the change in the length of AC, then the change in length of AD is ##\frac{x}{\sqrt{L^2+x^2}}dx##.
Or equivalently, if ##\delta_{AC}## is the change in length of AC, then the change in length of AD is ##\frac{AC}{AD}\delta_{AC}##:
$$\delta_{AD}=\frac{AC}{AD}\delta_{AC}$$
But,$$\frac{AC}{AD}=\cos{\theta}$$
Therefore,$$\delta_{AD}=\delta_{AC}\cos{\theta}$$
 
  • #17
Chestermiller said:
You still don't see it, huh?

Well, if dx is the change in the length of AC, then the change in length of AD is ##\frac{x}{\sqrt{L^2+x^2}}dx##.
Or equivalently, if ##\delta_{AC}## is the change in length of AC, then the change in length of AD is ##\frac{AC}{AD}\delta_{AC}##:
$$\delta_{AD}=\frac{AC}{AD}\delta_{AC}$$
But,$$\frac{AC}{AD}=\cos{\theta}$$
Therefore,$$\delta_{AD}=\delta_{AC}\cos{\theta}$$
Do you mean AC (del AC ) = xdx ?
 
  • #18
Chestermiller said:
You still don't see it, huh?

Well, if dx is the change in the length of AC, then the change in length of AD is ##\frac{x}{\sqrt{L^2+x^2}}dx##.
Or equivalently, if ##\delta_{AC}## is the change in length of AC, then the change in length of AD is ##\frac{AC}{AD}\delta_{AC}##:
$$\delta_{AD}=\frac{AC}{AD}\delta_{AC}$$
But,$$\frac{AC}{AD}=\cos{\theta}$$
Therefore,$$\delta_{AD}=\delta_{AC}\cos{\theta}$$
ok , but , i still dun know why Ac = Ad cos theta , where theta is between AC and AD ... because normally , we will make the 'slanted line ' to get the horizontal x -direction and vertical (y-direction ) , am i right ?
 
Last edited:
  • #19
one more thing, how could AD = AC cos theta , where cos theta = 4/5 ,
it's given that AD = 2 , AC = 1.6 AC cos theta = 1.6(4/5) = 1.28 which is not = AD (2m)
 
  • #20
i don't understand this part , we know that δ = PL / AE , we also know that δAD = (4/5)δAC , so , shouldn't (4/5)δAC = (4/5)(1.6) / AE ?
 

Attachments

  • 389.PNG
    389.PNG
    11.8 KB · Views: 415
  • #21
@Chestermiller
Chestermiller said:
## \frac{AC}{AD}=\cos{\theta} ##

Therefore,

## \delta_{AD}=\delta_{AC}\cos{\theta} ##
Isn't there a problem with this step?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chetzread
  • #22
$$AC=x$$
$$\delta_{AC}=dx$$
$$AD=\sqrt{L^2+x^2}$$
$$\delta_{AD}=d\sqrt{L^2+x^2}=\frac{x}{\sqrt{L^2+x^2}}dx=\frac{AC}{AD}\delta_{AC}=\frac{1.6}{2}\delta_{AC}=\frac{4}{5}\delta_{AC}$$
 
  • #24
chetzread said:
one more thing, how could AD = AC cos theta , where cos theta = 4/5 ,
it's given that AD = 2 , AC = 1.6AC cos theta = 1.6(4/5) = 1.28 which is not = AD (2m)
Who said AD=AC cos theta?
I said ##\delta_{AD}=\delta_{AC}\cos{\theta}##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K