Understanding Subspace Basis and Counterexample

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Caspian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Subspace
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of subspace bases in vector spaces, specifically in the context of \(\mathbb{R}^4\). It is established that if \(v_1, v_2, v_3, v_4\) form a basis for \(\mathbb{R}^4\), a subspace \(W\) can exist such that its basis does not include any of the vectors \(v_i\). The counterexample provided illustrates that while the vector \((1, 2, 3, 4)\) is a linear combination of the basis vectors, it does not belong to the span of the basis vectors when considering \(W\) as a proper subspace. Thus, the vectors \(v_i\) cannot serve as a basis for \(W\) since they span the entire space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and subspaces
  • Familiarity with basis and linear independence concepts
  • Knowledge of linear combinations in \(\mathbb{R}^4\)
  • Basic grasp of the properties of vector spans
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector spaces and subspaces in linear algebra
  • Learn about the concept of linear independence and its implications for bases
  • Explore the process of finding bases for subspaces in \(\mathbb{R}^n\)
  • Investigate the relationship between different bases of vector spaces and their spans
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of vector spaces and subspace bases.

Caspian
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
My book made the following claim... but I don't understand why it's true:

If v_1, v_2, v_3, v_4 is a basis for the vector space \mathbb{R}^4, and if W is a subspace, then there exists a W which has a basis which is not some subset of the v's.

The book provided a proof by counterexample: Let v_1 = (1, 0, 0, 0) ... v_2 = (0, 0, 0, 1). If W is the line through (1, 2, 3, 4), then none of the v's are in W.

Is it just me, or does this not make any sense? First of all, (1,2,3,4) is a linear combination of (1,0,0,0)...(0,0,0,1), isn't it?

I'm very confused...

Any help would be greatly appreciated :).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, but that's not what they're saying. They're saying that none of the four v_i vectors are in W. They're also saying that a basis vector of W (which must be a multiple of (1,2,3,4)) can't be equal to one of the v_i.

When they talk about the set of "v's" they really mean a set that only has four members, not the subspace they span.
 
Last edited:
Ok, ok... I get it. (1,2,3,4) is in the vector space spanned by (1,0,0,0)...(0,0,0,1), but these vectors aren't a basis for the subspace which is the line through (1,2,3,4) because these vectors span too much space.

Ok, I guess this was a dumb question. Thanks for your help :).
 
I don't think you fully get it yet.
Caspian said:
Ok, ok... I get it. (1,2,3,4) is in the vector space spanned by (1,0,0,0)...(0,0,0,1), but these vectors aren't a basis for the subspace which is the line through (1,2,3,4) because these vectors span too much space.
It should be obvious that B={(1,0,0,0),...,(0,0,0,1)} isn't a basis for W, since B spans the whole space R^4! So they can't be a basis for any proper subspace of V (indeed, they span "too much space").

But that's not what your book is asserting. They are only talking about a subset of B={(1,0,0,0),...,(0,0,0,1)}. So they're saying that even some subset of B cannot be a basis of W. Remember that a basis of W first of all consists of elements of W. None of the vectors in B are in W.
 
The point you need to keep in mind is that there exist an infinite number of different bases for any given vector space. If W is a subspace of V and we are given a basis for W, then we can extend that to a basis for V. That is, the basis for V will consist of all vectors in the basis for W together with some other vectors. But there can also exist bases for V that do not contain any of the vectors in the basis for W.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K