Is the Betz Limit Calculation Based on Inaccurate Assumptions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter QwertyXP
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
AI Thread Summary
The Betz Limit calculation assumes a constant mass flow rate of wind regardless of measurement location, which raises questions about its accuracy. The reference power for Betz efficiency is typically calculated using the wind velocity downstream, but this assumes the cross-sectional area of wind remains constant, contradicting the mass flow rate assumption. The discussion suggests that the reference power should account for the actual wind velocity at the turbine blades, leading to a more complex expression that includes unknown variables. Ultimately, extracting power from the wind inevitably alters its flow, which explains why turbines cannot achieve 100% efficiency. This analysis highlights potential inaccuracies in the foundational assumptions of the Betz Limit.
QwertyXP
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Betz Limit

The amount of power in wind can be expressed as: 0.5*M*(V^2), where M=mass flow rate.

As per my knowledge, we assume M to be constant regardless of where we are measuring it, downstream, upstream or close to the wind turbine.

If measuring close to the wind turbine, the expression for M would be:
M=ρ*S*Vb

where S=the area sweeped by the wind turbine blades and Vb=velocity of wind at the blades


Now, When finding the power coefficient, why do we take the reference power for the Betz efficiency calculation to be equal to 0.5*ρ*S*(Vd^3), where Vd=velocity of wind downstream

The above expression for reference power (or total power available in the wind) could also be written as:
0.5*(ρ*S*Vd)*Vd^2

So here we are assuming that the cross-sectional area of wind downstream is the same as the cross-sectional area of wind close to the turbine, which appears to be wrong because then the mass flow rate would no longer be constant!

It seems to me that the reference power (or total power available in the wind) should actually be:
Pref=0.5*M*Vd^2
=0.5*ρ*S*Vb*(Vd^2)

But then, this expression is useless because we don't know the value of Vb..except that Vb=0.5*(Vd+Vu)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The total power available from the wind is the power "flowing" throigh the area of the turbine, when the turbine is not there. That is what your first fornula 0.5*M*(V^2) says.

Of course there is no way to extract some of the power without changing the wind flow in some way. That's why you can't make a turbine that is 100% efficient.
 
Thanks a lot! This problem was troubling me quite a bit.
 
Thread 'I need a concave mirror with a focal length length of 150 feet'
I need to cut down a 3 year old dead tree from top down so tree causes no damage with small pieces falling. I need a mirror with a focal length of 150 ft. 12" diameter to 36" diameter will work good but I can't think of any easy way to build it. Nothing like this for sale on Ebay. I have a 30" Fresnel lens that I use to burn stumps it works great. Tree service wants $2000.
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...
Back
Top