Understanding the Derivative of e^u with Examples

  • Thread starter Thread starter UrbanXrisis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
AI Thread Summary
The derivative of e^u is expressed as e^u * du/dx, where u is a function of x. The derivative of the constant e itself is zero, as it does not depend on x. For the function e^(1+x), the derivative is simply e^(1+x) since the derivative of (1+x) with respect to x is 1. It's crucial to clarify what variable you are differentiating with respect to, as this affects the outcome. The discussion emphasizes the importance of keeping the notation clear and distinguishing between constants and functions when taking derivatives.
UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
the derivative of e^u = e^u du/dx

so the derivative of e would be 0 since:
e^1 * 0 = 0

is this correct?

well, I knot it's not correct because derivative of e = e. It's because 1 is a constant right?

derivative of e^(1+x) = e^(1+x) * 2

is that correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The derivative of e is 0 since e by itself is a constant (just like pi).

The derivative of e^(1+x) is [e^(1+x)][1][dx].

The derivative of e^x is (e^x)(dx)

Hope that clarifies things up for you.
 
"The derivative of e^(1+x) is [e^(1+x)][1][dx]."

wouldn't it be The derivative of e^(1+x) is [e^(1+x)][1]+[dx].
 
The derivative must always be taken with respect to some variable. You can't just say "take the derivative of e^u".

Using u as the variable, the derivative df(u)/du of the function f(u) = e^u is e^u.
Therefore the derivative of e^u with respect to u AT u = 1 is df(1)/du = e^1 = e.

If u is actually a function itself, say u = g(x), then when we take the derivative of e^u, we are taking it with respect to x. Then e^u = e^(g(x)) = f(x)

Now the derivative according to the chain rule is df(x)/dx = e^(g(x)).dg(x)/dx = e^u . du/dx. When you said that e^u du/dx = 0, this is only true if u is constant no matter what x is.

You can see here that if f = e^u, df/du = e^u but df/dx = e^u du/dx, two different things.
 
UrbanXrisis said:
"The derivative of e^(1+x) is [e^(1+x)][1][dx]."

wouldn't it be The derivative of e^(1+x) is [e^(1+x)][1]+[dx].
Erk. Let's try to keep straight what we're doing here.

The "derivative", all by itself, doesn't mean anything -- you need to say what you're differentiating with respect to.

The derivative of the number "e" with respect to x is zero because e isn't a function of x (or anything else -- it's a constant).

The derivative of the function ex with respect to x is the function ex, or more clearly,

\frac{d(e^x)}{dx}|_u = e^u

In other words, the the derivative of ex with respect to x, evaluated at x=u, is the value eu.

But please get those "dx" terms out of the derivative -- they have no business there. In basic differential calculus you should treat the "dx" as a reminder of what you're differentiating with respect to, and a nice reminder that it's a ratio of small values that you're talking about, but you shouldn't have it appearing by itself.

Now as to that last derivative you asked about...

\frac{d(e^{1+x})}{dx} = e^{1+x}

That's all -- no other terms appear, because

\frac{d(1+x)}{dx} = 1

Now as to that "dx" -- you can call it a differential, in which case it's a linear function. You can call it a total derivative, but then you're talking about multivariable calculus, which isn't what you're asking about here. You can use it as the gradient 1-form of the basis function x, but that's really not what you're talking about here. Or you can use it as an "infinitesimal", which is the closest thing to what you're trying to do with it, but without a great deal more work to make "infinitesimals" into something rigorous it's just shorthand for the epsilon/delta limit process and you need to be careful to follow the rules if you use it that way. But if you want to end up with an actual function which can be evaluated at a particular point, which is what you're talking about when you say something like "the derivative of ex is ex", then you really need to keep the "dx" over there on the left with the derivative, and keep the result, over on the right, "clean".
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top