Understanding the Effects of a Conducting Plate on a Parallel Plate Capacitor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the effects of inserting an isolated conducting plate into a parallel plate capacitor. The electric fields between the conductors are derived using Gauss's law, resulting in expressions for both positively and negatively charged plates. The potential difference is calculated by integrating the electric field, leading to a new capacitance formula that incorporates the thickness of the conducting plate. The energy density of the charged capacitors is also addressed, with a note on the uniform potential within the conducting slab. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding electrostatic principles in this context.
Abdul.119
Messages
73
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Consider a parallel plate capacitor of area A and separation d. The plates are isloated. One has charge +Q and the other -Q. An isolated conducting plate of area A and thickness t is inserted between the plates as shown.
i71ls1.jpg

a. Find the E fields between the conductors

b. Find the potentials between the conductors

c. Using the above, find the capacitance of this new arrangement and compare with C before inserting the conducting plate.

d. Calaculate the energy density
gif.gif
of the charged capacitors before and after inserting the conducting plate

Homework Equations


σ = Q / A

The Attempt at a Solution


a. From Gauss's law, the E field for parallel plates E = σ / ε = Q / Aε , for the plate that is negatively charged, E = - Q / Aε

b. From V(x) = -∫E dx (from 0 to x), The potential is V = E * d = Qd / Aε , but we want to find the potential to the slab in the middle, so substitute d with d/2 + t/2, then V = E * (d+t)/2 = (Q(d+t)/2) / Aε = Q(d+t) / 2Aε

c. The capacitance C = Q/V
C = Q / (Q(d+t) / 2Aε) = 2Aε / (d+t)
Without the slab in the middle, C = 2Aε / d

I hope my steps are correct so far, and I don't know how to find the energy density here, I believe the energy density of a field is 1/2 * ε E^2 , but not sure how the slab would affect it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are some important requirements to recall for electrostatics in conductors. For a conducting block there will be no electric field inside the conductor. The potential inside the block is the same everywhere, constant or zero difference. All the charge will be distributed on the surface, and the electric field lines at the surface will be perpendicular to it.
Have you drawn a sketch of the field lines?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top