Understanding the Equation (Gm)/(r-S)^2 = (GM)/r^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter highc
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation (Gm)/(r-S)^2 = (GM)/r^2 was initially discussed, but it was identified as incorrect. The correct form should be (Gm)/(r-S)^2 = (GM)/S^2, highlighting a significant error in the original equation. Additionally, there were concerns about unit consistency, as S is a length while the right side of the equation had units of length squared. Given these inaccuracies, the derived value for S is deemed irrelevant. The discussion emphasizes the importance of verifying equations and their units in physics problems.
highc
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I'm working through a problem that was posted here a while ago (https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=115170). maltesers posted the equation (Gm)/(r-S)^2 = (GM)/r^2, so far this makes perfect sense, he then goes on to solve for S with S = r - (mr^2)/M, and it is here that he loses me. How did we eliminate the ^2 to go from (r-S)^2 to S = r - ...?

I've been out of the math game a little too long!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That equation is actually incorrect. It should have been

\frac{Gm}{(r-S)^2} = \frac{GM}{S^2}
 
neutrino said:
That equation is actually incorrect. It should have been

\frac{Gm}{(r-S)^2} = \frac{GM}{S^2}

This not the only thing wrong.

Look at units. In maltesers' last equation, S is a length, while the last term on the right has units of length squared.
 
George Jones said:
This not the only thing wrong.

Look at units. In maltesers' last equation, S is a length, while the last term on the right has units of length squared.
Now that it's known that the original equation is wrong, why bother about what was derived from it. :-p

Thanks for pointing that out.
 
Thanks alot, I wasted way too much time on this one.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top